Intramolecular charge transfer and biomimetic reaction kinetics in galactose oxidase model complexes

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 29, 2003, Pages 8716-8717

  Pratt, Russell C ^a   Stack, T Daniel P ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZYL ALCOHOL; GALACTOSE OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; BIOMIMETICS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; ENZYME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; OXIDATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY;

BENZYL ALCOHOL; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; COPPER; GALACTOSE OXIDASE; KINETICS; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED;

EID: 0038298135     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja035837j     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Klinman, J. P. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2541-2562.
2. Whittaker, J. W.; Whittaker, M. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 903-910.
3. Whittaker, J. W. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2347-2364.
4. Stubbe, J.; van der Donk, W. A. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 705-762.
5. Ito, N.; Phillips, S. E. V.; Stevens, C.; Ogel, Z. B.; McPherson, M. J.; Keen, J. N.; Yadav, K. D. S.; Knowles, P. F. Nature 1991, 350, 87-90.
6. Ito, N.; Phillips, S. E. V.; Yadav, K. D. S.; Knowles, P. F. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 238, 794-814.
7. Chaudhuri, P.; Hess, M.; Muller, J.; Hildenbrand, K.; Bill, E.; Weyhermuller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9599-9610.
8. Itoh, S.; Taki, M.; Takayama, S.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Sakurada, N.; Arakawa, R.; Fukuzumi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2774-2776.
9. Jazdzewski, B. A.; Tolman, W. B. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 200, 633-685.
10. Thomas, F.; Gellon, G.; Gautier-Luneau, I.; Saint-Aman, E.; Pierre, J.-L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3047-3050.
11. Wang, Y.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13097-13098.
12. Wang, Y.; DuBois, J. L.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Stack, T. D. P. Science 1998, 279, 537-540.
13. Böttcher, A.; Elias, H.; Jäger, E. G.; Langfelderova, H.; Mazur, M.; Müller, L.; Paulus, H.; Pelikan, P.; Rudolph, M.; Valko, M. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4131-4138.
14. Bunce, S.; Cross, R. J.; Farrugia, L. J.; Kunchandy, S.; Meason, L. L.; Muir, K. W.; O'Donnell, M.; Peacock, R. D.; Stirling, D.; Teat, S. J. Polyhedron 1998, 17, 4179-4187.
15. Klement, R.; Stock, F.; Elias, H.; Paulus, H.; Pelikàn, P.; Valko, M.; Mazur, M. Polyhedron 1999, 18, 3617-3628.
16. Leung, W. H.; Chan, E. Y. Y.; Chow, E. K. F.; Williams, I. D.; Peng, S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 1229-1236.
17. Saint-Aman, E.; Menage, S.; Pierre, J. L.; Defrancq, E.; Gellon, G. New J. Chem. 1998, 22, 393-394. While 2 resembles the model complex reported in this reference, the greater solubility of 2 in most organic solvents provides significant experimental advantages.
18. 2+: 405 (5800), 418 (5800), 476 (sh), 592 (1300). For [2H]+: 447 (1000), 600 (800). See also Supporting Information.
19. Carty, P.; Dove, M. F. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 28, 125-132.
20. Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 877-910.
21. McGlashen, M. L.; Eads, D. D.; Spiro, T. G.; Whittaker, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 4918-4922.
22. Rogers, M. S.; Knowles, P. F.; Baron, A. J.; McPherson, M. J.; Dooley, D. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 276, 175-181.
23. 2+ at 77 K shows an isotropic signal at g = 2.0 with low signal intensity (<20% relative to 2); this species is expected to have complex magnetic behavior. See Bill, E.; Muller, J.; Weyhermuller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 5795-5802.
24. Carina, R. F.; Verzegnassi, L.; Bernardinelli, G.; Williams, A. F. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2681-2682.
25. Sellmann, D.; Becker, T.; Knoch, F. Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1092-1098.
26. Whittaker, M. M.; Ballou, D. P.; Whittaker, J. W. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 8426-8436.
27. Whittaker, M. M.; Whittaker, J. W. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 7140-7148.