History of tropospheric ozone for the San Bernardino Mountains of Southern California, 1963-1999

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 37, Issue 19, 2003, Pages 2705-2717

  Lee, E Henry ^a   Tingey, David T ^a   Hogsett, William E ^a   Laurence, John A ^b  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Ozone trends; Photochemical oxidants; San Bernardino Mountains; Southern California

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; OZONE; PHOTOMETRY; POLLUTION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

DATA SETS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

OZONE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; OZONE; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; TRAFFIC EMISSION; TROPOSPHERE;

ACCURACY; AIR POLLUTION; AMBIENT AIR; DATA BASE; HISTORY; MONITORING; MOTOR VEHICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TROPOSPHERE; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038289118     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00203-6     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Alexis, A., Delao, A., Garcia, A., Nystrom, M., Rosenkranz, K., 2001. The 2001 California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality. California Planning and Technical Support Division, Air Resources Board, Sacramento, Calif. [ http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac01/almanac01.htm ].
2. Arbaugh, M.J., Johnson, D.W., Pulliam, W.M., 1998. Simulated effects of N deposition, ozone injury and climate change on a forest stand in the San Bernardino Mountains. In: Miller, P.R., McBride, J.R. (Eds.), Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California, a Case Study of the San Bernardino Mountains, Ecological Studies, Vol. 134. Springer, New York, pp. 353-372.
3. Asher, J.E., 1956. Observation and theory on 'X' disease or needle dieback. File Report. Arrowhead District, San Bernardino National Forest, California.
4. Cherniack E.A., Bryan R.J. A comparison study of various types of ozone and oxidant detectors which are used for atmospheric air sampling. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. 15:1965;351-354.
5. Earthinfo, 1992. Earthinfo's NCDC Summary of the Day User's Manual. Earthinfo, Inc., Boulder.
6. Fuller, W.A., 1995. Introduction to Statistical Time Series, 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York, 728pp.
7. Hoggan M.C. Comment on "Ten-year ozone trends in California and Texas" Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. 36:1986;599-602.
8. Isaacson J.D., Zimmerman D.L. Combining temporally correlated environmental data from two measurement systems. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 5:2000;398-416.
9. Little, Jr. E.L., 1971. Atlas of United States Trees, Volume 1: Conifers and Important Hardwoods. Government Printing Office, USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publications 1146, Washington, Map 75-E.
10. Lu R., Turco R.P., Jacobson M.Z. An integrated air pollution modeling system for urban and regional scales: Part I. structure and performance Journal of Geophysical Research. 102:1997;6063-6079.
11. Lu R., Turco R.P., Jacobson M.Z. An integrated air pollution modeling system for urban and regional scales: Part II. simulations for SCAQS 1987 Journal of Geophysical Research. 102:1997;6081-6098.
12. MathSoft, 2000. S-PLUS 6 Guide to Statistics, Vol. 1-2. Data Analysis Division, MathSoft, Seattle, WA.
13. Miller P.R. Ozone effects in the San Bernardino National Forest. Davis D.D., Millen A.A., Dochinger L. Air Pollution and the Productivity of the Forest: Proceedings of the Symposium, October 1983, Washington, DC. 1984;161-197 Izaak Walton League of America, Arlington.
14. Miller P.R., McBride J.R. Effects of air pollutants on forests. Mudd J.J., Kozlowski T.T. Responses of Plants to Air Pollution. 1975;196-236 Academic Press, New York.
15. Miller, P.R., McBride, J.R., 1998. Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California. Springer, New York, 424pp.
16. Newchurch, M.J., Ayoub, M.A., Oltmans, S., Johnson, B., Schmidlin, F.J., 2003. Vertical distribution of ozone at four sites in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, 4031, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002059.
17. Pitts J.N. Jr., Sprung J.L., Poe M., Carpelan M.C., Lloyd A.C. Corrected South Coast Air Basin oxidant data. some conclusions and implications Environmental Science and Technology. 10:1976;794-801.
18. Ray J.D. Spatial distribution of tropospheric ozone measurements in national parks of California. interpretation of passive-sampler data. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Passive Sampling of Gaseous Air Pollutants in Ecological Effects Research The Scientific World. 1:2001;483-497.
19. Saltzman B.E., Wartburg A.F. Jr. Absorption tube for removal of interfering sulfur dioxide in analysis of atmospheric oxidant. Analytical Chemistry. 37:1965;779-782.
20. 2 and temperature alter the response of Pinus ponderosa to ozone. a simulation analysis Ecological Applications. 11:2001;1412-1424.
21. Tokiwa Y., Twiss S., de Vera E.R., Mueller P.K. Atmospheric ozone determination by amperometry and colorimetry. Mamantov G., Shults W.D. Determination of Air Quality: Proceedings of the ACS Symposium on Determination of Air Quality, April 1971, Los Angeles, CA. 1972;109-130 Plenum Press, New York.
22. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1978. Air quality criteria for ozone and other photochemical oxidants, Vol. II. EPA/600/8-78-004. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research Triangle Park, NC, available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB80-124753.
23. Walker H.M. Ten-year ozone trends in California and Texas. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. 35:1985;903-912.