Residual disease in DCIS: An excision too far?

Cancer Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-32

  Morrow, Monica ^a,b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CARCINOMA; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; REOPERATION;

EID: 0038284076     PISSN: 15289117     EISSN: 1540336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200301000-00006     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Harris EER, Schultz DJ, Jones HA, Solin LJ et al. Factors associated with residual disease on re-excision in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer J 2003;9:41-47.
2. Morrow M, Strom E, Bassett LW et al. Standards for management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:277-300.
3. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al. Tamoxifen treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B24 randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1993-2000.
4. Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L et al. Risk factors for recurrence andmetastasis after breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2263-2271.
5. Solin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2002;50:991-1002.
6. Hiramatsu H, Bornstein BA, Recht A et al. Local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: possible importance of family history. Cancer J Sci Am 1995;1:55-61.
7. Fourquet A, Sigal-Zafrani B, Clough KB. Breast conserving surgery plus radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: The Institut Curie experience. In: Silverstein MJ, ed. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: LippincottWilliams & Wilkins, 2002:367-372.
8. Chan KC, Knox WF, Sinha G et al. Extent ofmargin width required in breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 2001;91:9-16.
9. Holland R, Veling S, Mravunac M. et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast conserving treatment. Cancer 1985;56:979-986.
10. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast And Bowel Project B17. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:441-452.
11. Faverly DRG, Burgers L, Bult P et al. Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994;11:193-198.
12. Ratanawichitrasin A, Rybicki LA, Steiger E et al. Predicting the likelihood of residual disease in women treated for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:17-21.
13. Cheng L, Al-Kaisi NK, Gordon NH et al. Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1356-1360.
14. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Colburn WJ et al. Can intraductal breast carcinoma be completely excised by local excision? Clinical and pathologic predictors. Cancer 1994;73:2985-2989.
15. Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002;94:1917-1924.
16. Waddell BE, Stomper PC, DeFazio JL et al. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:665-668.
17. Gibson GR, Lesnikowski BA, Yoo J et al. A comparison of ink-and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:693-704.