Estimating plant migration rates under habitat loss and fragmentation

Oikos

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 354-366

  Higgins, Steven I ^a,b   Lavorel, Sandra ^b   Revilla, Eloy ^a,c  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; MIGRATION; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY;

LEUCISCUS IDUS;

EID: 0038276039     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12141.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bond, W. J. 1988. Proteas and 'tumbleseeds': wind dispersal through air and over soil. - S. Afr. J. Bot. 54: 455-460.
2. Bonn, S., Poschlod, P. and Tackenberg, O. 2000. "Diasporus" - a database for diaspore dispersal - concept and applications in case studies for risk assessment. - Z. Ökologie und Naturschutz 9: 85-98.
3. Bullock, J. M. and Clarke, R. T. 2000. Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve. - Oecologia 124: 506-521.
4. Cain, M. L., Damman, H. and Muir, A. 1998. Seed dispersal and the Holocene migration of woodland herbs. - Ecol. Monogr. 68: 325-347.
5. Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G. and Strand, A. E. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. - Am. J. Bot. 87: 1217-1227.
6. Clark, J. S. 1998. Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord. - Am. Nat. 152: 204-224.
7. Clark, J. S., Fastie, C., Hurtt, G. et al. 1998. Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration - dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. - Bioscience 48: 13-24.
8. Clark, J. S., Silman, M., Kern, R. et al. 1999. Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. - Ecology 80: 1475-1494.
9. Collingham, Y. C. and Huntley, B. 2000. Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. - Ecol. Appl. 10: 131-144.
10. Diaz, S. and Cabido, M. 1997. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. - J. Veg. Sci. 8: 463-474.
11. Gardner, R. H. 1999. RULE: Map generation and spatial analysis program. - In: Klopatek, J. M. and Gardner, R. H. (eds), Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer Verlag, pp. 280-303.
12. Gardner, R. H., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G. and O'Neill, R. V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape patterns. - Landscape Ecol. 1: 19-28.
13. Hannah, L., Midgley, G. F., Lovejoy, T. et al. 2002. Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. - Conserv. Biol. 16: 264-268.
14. Higgins, S. I. and Richardson, D. M. 1999. Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. - Am. Nat. 153: 464-475.
15. Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M. and Cowling, R. M. 1996. Modeling invasive plant spread: the role of plant-environment interactions and model structure. - Ecology 77: 2043-2054.
16. Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M., Cowling, R. M. and Trinder-Smith, T. H. 1999. Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 303-313.
17. Howe, H. F. and Smallwood, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 201-228.
18. Kirilenko, A. P., Belotelov, N. V. and Bogatyrev, B. G. 2000. Global model of vegetation migration: incorporation of climatic variability. - Ecol. Modell. 132: 125-133.
19. Lavorel, S., Gardner, R. H. and O'Neill, R. V. 1995. Dispersal of annual plants in hierachically structured landscapes. - Landscape Ecol. 10: 277-289.
20. McIntyre, N. E. and Wiens, J. A. 1999. Interactions between landscape structure and animal behavior: the roles of heterogeneously distributed resources and food deprivation on movement patterns. - Landscape Ecol. 14: 437-447.
21. Monkkonen, M. and Reunaen, P. 2001. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective. - Oikos 84: 302-305.
22. Nathan, R. and Muller-Landau, H. C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 278-285.
23. Neubert, M. G. and Caswell, H. 2000. Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. - Ecol. 81: 1613-1628.
24. Palomares, F., Delibes, M., Ferreras, P. et al. 2000. Iberian lynx in a fragmented landscape: predispersal, dispersal, and postdispersal habitats. - Conserv. Biol. 14: 809-818.
25. Pitelka, L. F., Gardner, R. H., Ash, J. et al. 1997. Plant migration and climate change. - Am. Sci. 85: 464-473.
26. Plotnick, R. and Gardner, R. H. 1993. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. - Landscape Ecol. 8: 201-211.
27. Saupe, D. 1988. Algorithms for random fractals. - In: Peitgen, H. O. and Barnsley, M. F. (eds), The science of fractal images. Springer, pp. 71-136.
28. Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K. a. and Takeda, Y. 1995. Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. - Am. Nat. 146: 229-251.
29. Skellam, J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. - Biometrika 38: 196-218.
30. Stauffer, D. and Aharony, A. 1992. Introduction to percolation theory. - Taylor & Francis.
31. Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. - Ecology 78: 81-92.
32. Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L. 2000. How should we measure landscape connectivity? - Landscape Ecol. 15: 633-641.
33. Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement. Measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. - Sinauer.
34. Turnbull, L. A., Crawley, M. T., Rees, M. 2000. Are plant populations seed limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. - Oikos 88: 225-238.
35. van der Pijl, L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. - Springer.
36. Weinberger, H. F. 1982. Long-time behaviour of a class of biological models. - SIAM J. Math. Anal. 13: 353-396.
37. Wiens, J. A., Schooley, R. L. and Weeks, R. D. 1997. Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? - Oikos 78: 257-264.
38. With, K. A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. - Landscape Ecol. 9: 25-36.
39. With, K. A. and Crist, T. O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. - Ecology 76: 2446-2459.
40. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1997. The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. - Oikos 79: 219-229.
41. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1999. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 314-326.
42. With, K. A. and Crist, T. O. 1996. Translating across scales: simulating species distributions as the aggregate response of individuals to heterogeneity. - Ecol. Modell. 93: 125-137.
43. With, K. A., Gardner, R. H. and Turner, M. G. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. - Oikos 78: 151-169.
44. With, K. A., Cadaret, S. J. and Davis, C. 1999. Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes. - Ecology 80: 1340-1353.