Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Geographic Research Questions and Agendas

Professional Geographer

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 162-169

  Flint, Colin ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterterrorism; Political geography; Terrorism

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; TERRORISM; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 0038270029     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.5502004     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Agnew, J. 1999. Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: Territory, identity, and movement in world politics.Millennium28:499-521.
2. Agnew, J., and S. Corbridge. 1995.Mastering space.New York: Routledge.
3. Arquilla, J., and D. Ronfeldt. 1997.In Athena’s camp.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
4. Arquilla, J., and D. Ronfeldt. 2001. Osama bin Laden and the advent of Netwar.New Perspectives Quarterly18 (4): 23-33.
5. Arquilla, J., D. Ronfeldt, and M. Zanini. 1999. Networks, netwar, and Information-Age terrorism. InCountering the new terrorism, ed. I. O. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, and M. Zanini, 39-84. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6. Bauman, Z. 1999.In search of politics.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Beck, U. 1997.The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order.Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
8. Bell, J. E., and L. A. Stacheli. 2001. Discourses of diffusion and democratization.Political Geography20(2): 175-95.
9. Black, J. 2001.War in the new century.New York: Continuum.
10. Boulding, K. 1990.Three faces of power.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Bowen, D. 2000. Something must be done—Military intervention.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism23 (1): 1-19.
12. Byman, D. L. 2001. Give selected insurgents selected kinds of support.&4ND Review25 (3): 17-18.
13. Crenshaw, M. 1981. Thoughts on relating terrorism to historical contexts. InTerrorism in context, ed. AI. Crenshaw, 3-24. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
14. Cutter, S., D. Richardson, and T. Wilbanks, eds. 2003.The geographical dimensions of terrorism: Action items and research priorities.New York: Routledge.
15. Dcutch, J. 1997. Terrorism.Foreign PolicyFall: 10-22.
16. Dijkink, G. 1996.National identity and geopolitical visions: Maps of pride and pain.New York: Routledge.
17. Donnan, H., and T. M. Wilson. 1999.Borders: Frontiers of identity, nation and state.New York: Berg.
18. Dowler, L., and J. Sharp. 2001. A feminist geopolitics?Space and Polity5 (3): 165-76.
19. Eppright, C. T. 1997. “Counterterrorism” and conventional military force: The relationship between practical effect and utility.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism20 (4): 333-44.
20. Escobar, A. 2001. Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization.Political Geography20 (2): 139-74.
21. Flint, C. 2001. Initial thoughts towards political geographies in the wake of 11 September 2001: An introduction.Arab World Geographer4 (2): 77-80.
22. Galtung, J. 1996.Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Green, J. D. 2001. Promote democracy and legitimate governments.R IND Review25 (3): 15-16.
24. Gregory, D. 1994.Geographical imaginations.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
25. Guclke, A. 1995.The age of terrorism and the international political system.New York: Tauris Academic Studies.
26. Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000.Empire.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Hoffman, B. 1993.The implications of terrorism motivated by a religious imperative.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
28. Hoffman, B. 1994.Responding to terrorism across the technological spectrum.Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
29. Hoffman, B. 1998.Inside terrorism.New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Hoffman, B. 1999. Terrorism, trends, and prospects. InCountering the new terrorism, ed. I. O. Lesser, B. Hoftman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, andM. Zanini, 7-38. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31. Hoffman, B. 2001a. Change and continuity in terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism24 (5): 417-28.
32. Hoffman, B. 2001 b. Rethinking terrorism in light of a war on terrorism. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. U.S. House of Representatives, 26 September 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33. House Committee on Armed Services. 2001. Patterns of global terrorism and threats to the United States. Hearing before the Special Oversight Panel on Terrorism of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, 107th Congress, 1st sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing-Office.
34. Jenkins, B. M. 2001. Terrorism and beyond: A 21st-century perspective.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism24(5): 321-27.
35. Juergensmeyer, M. 2001.Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence.Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Kaldor, M. 1999.New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era.Stanford, CA Stanford University Press.
37. Klare, M. 1995.Rogue states and nuclear outlaws: America's search for a new foreign policy.New York: Hill and Wang.
38. Kliot, N., and S. Waterman. 1991.The political geography of conflict and peace.London: Belhaven Press.
39. Kong, L. 2001. Mapping “new” geographies of religion: Politics and poetics in modernity.Progress in Human Geography25 (2): 211-33.
40. Laqueur, W. 1987.The age of terrorism.Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
41. Le Billon, P. 2001. The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts.Political G eography20: 561 -84.
42. Lederach, J. P. 2001.Quo vadis? Ref rawing terror from the perspective of conflict resolution.The Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, http://www.nd.edu/krocinst/septl 1/ledquo.html (last accessed 3 January 2003).
43. Lesser, I. O. 1999. Countering the new terrorism: Implications for strategy. InCountering the new terrorism, ed. I. O. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, and M. Zanini, 85-144. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
44. Lesser, I. O. 2001. Strike at the roots of terrorism.&4ND Review25 (3): 14-15.
45. Mamadouh, V. 1999. Reclaiming geopolitics: Geographers strike back.Geopolitics4 (1): 118-38.
46. Medd, R., and F. Goldstein. 1997. International terrorism on the eve of a new millennium.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism20 (3): 281-316.
47. Modelski, G. 1987.Long cycles of world politics.London: Macmillan.
48. Newman, D., and A. Paasi. 1998. Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography.Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 186-207.
49. Oas, I. 2002. The spatial dementia of geopolitics: Online agency and U.S. hegemonic decline. Master’s thesis, Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University.
50. O’Loughlin, J., and L. Anselin. 1992. Geography of international conflicts: Theory and methods. In The new geopolitics, ed. M. D. Ward, 11-38. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach.
51. O’Loughlin, J., and H. Heske. 1991. From “geopo-litik” to “geopolitique”: Converting a discipline for war to a discipline for peace. InThe political geography of conflict and peace, ed. N. Kliot and S. Waterman, 37-59. London: Belhaven Press.
52. O’Loughlin, J., and H. van der Wusten. 1993. Political geography of war and peace. InPolitical geography of the twentieth century, ed. P. J. Taylor, 65-113. London: Belhaven Press.
53. O’Loughlin, J., AI. D. Ward, C. Lofdahl, J. S. Cohen, D. S. Brown, D. Reilly, K. Gleditsch, and M. Shin. 1998. The diffusion of democracy, 1946-1994.Annals of the Association of American Geographers88 (4): 545-74.
54. O’Sullivan, P. 2001.The geography of war in the post Cold War world.Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
55. OTuathail, G. 1996.Critical geopolitics.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
56. 2000. The postmodern geopolitical condition.A nnals of the Association of American Geographers90 (1): 166-78.
57. Pepper, D., and A. Jenkins. 1985.The geography of peace and war.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
58. Pile, S. 1997. Introduction: Opposition, political identities and spaces of resistance. InGeographies of resistance, ed. S. Pile and M. Keith, 1-32. New York: Routledge.
59. Pillar, P. R. 2001.Terrorism and U.S. foreign policy.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
60. Pumphrey, C. W. 2000. Introduction. InTransnational threats: Blending law enforcement and military strategies, ed. C. W. Pumphrey, 1-18. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
61. Ranstorp, M. 1998. Interpreting the broader context and meaning of bin Laden’sfatwa. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism21 (4): 321-30.
62. Rapoport, D. C. 1984. Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions.American Political Science Review78 (3): 658-77.
63. Rapoport, D. C. 2001. The fourth wave: September 11 in the history of terrorism.Current History100 (650): 419-24.
64. Ronfeldt, D., and J. Arquilla. 2001. Networks, netwars, and the fight for the future.First Monday6 (10).http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_10/ronfeldt/index.html (last accessed 3 January 2003).
65. Santos, B. d. S. 1999. Toward a multicultural conception of human rights. InSpaces of culture: City, nation, world, ed. M. Featherstone and S. Lash, 214—29. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
66. Savitch, H. V., and G. Ardashev. 2001. Does terror have an urban future?Urban Studies38(13): 2515-33.
67. Sprinzak, E. 1998. The great superterrorism scare.Foreign PolicyFall: 110-24.
68. Sprinzak, E. 2001. The lone gunmen.Foreign Policy Novembcr/Dccembcr: 72-73.
69. Stump, R. W. 2000.Boundaries of faith: Geographical perspectives on religious fundamentalism.Lanham, AID: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
70. Talbott, S. 2001. The other evil.Foreign PolicyNovember/December: 75-76.
71. Taylor, P. J. 1998.Modernities: A geohistorical interpretation.Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
72. Taylor, P. J. 2000. Embedded statism and the social sciences. Part 2: Geographies (and metageographies) in globalization.Environment and Planning A32:1105-14.
73. Thomson, J. A. 2001. Suddenly, a new NATO agenda.RIND Review25 (3): 13.
74. Tucker, D. 1997.Skirmishes at the edge of empire: The United States and international terrorism.Westport, CT: Praeger.
75. U.S. Army’s Command and General Staff College. 2001. Types of terrorist motivation: Rational, psychological and cultural. InThe Terrorism Reader, ed. D. J. Whitaker, 17-21. New York: Routledge.
76. U.S. Department of State. 2001.Patterns of global terrorism 2000.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
77. Veness, D. 2001. Terrorism and counterterrorism: An international perspective.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism24 (5): 407-16.
78. Wallensteen, P. 2001. The growing peace research agenda. Kroc Institute Occasional Paper #21: OP:4. The Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, http://www.nd.edu/-krocinst/ocpapers/ahs_2 l_4.htm (last accessed 3 January 2003).
79. Wallensteen, P. 2002.Understanding conflict resolution: War, peace and the global system.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
80. Wallerstein, I. 1984.The politics of the world economy.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
81. Wallerstein, I. 1998. The time of space and the space of time: The future of social science.Political Geo-graphy19 (1): 71-82.
82. Ward, M. D., and K. S. Gleditsch. 2002. Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace.Political Analysis10: 244-60.