The 1880 U.S. Population database

Historical Methods

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 27-34

  Goeken, Ron ^a   Nguyen, Cuong ^a   Ruggles, Steven ^a   Sargent, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

1880 census; IPUMS; Microdata; Population

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; DATABASE; DEMOGRAPHIC HISTORY; DOCUMENTARY SOURCE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038265553     PISSN: 01615440     EISSN: 19401906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01615440309601212     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tickler, A. R. 1972. The Bureau of the Census. New York: Praeger.
2. Ferrie, J. P. 1996. A new sample of males linked from the public use microdata sample of the 1850 U.S. federal census of population to the I860 U.S. federal census manuscripts. Historical Methods 29: 141-56.
3. Gardner, T. 1998. The rise of the American suburb, 1850-1950. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.
4. Guest, A. 1987. Notes from the national panel study: Linkage and migration in the late nineteenth ccntury. Historical Methods 20: 63-77.
5. Katz, M. B. 1975. The people of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and class in a mid-nineteenth-century city. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. King, M. L., and S. Ruggles. 1990. American immigration, fertility differentials, and the ideology of race suicide at the turn of the century. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 20: 347-69.
7. Knights, P. R. 1991. Yankee destinies: The lives of ordinary nineteenth-century Bostonians. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
8. Leet, D. R. 1977. Interrelations of population density, urbanization, literacy, and fertility. Explorations in Economic History 14(4): 388-410.
9. Magnuson, D. L. 1995. The making of a modern census: The United States census of population. 1790-1950. Ph.D. diss. University of Minnesota.
10. National Archives. 1979. federal population censuses, 1790-1890: A catalog of microfilm copies of the schedules. Washington, D.C.: National Archives Trust Fund Board.
11. Rugglcs, S. 1997. The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880-1980. Demography 34: 455-66.
12. Ruggles, S., and M. Sobck. 1998. IPUMS-98: integrated Public Use Microdata Series. 5 vols. Minneapolis: Historical Census Project, University of Minnesota.
13. Schapiro, M. O. 1985. A general dynamic model of the 19th ccntury U.S. population change. Economic Modelling 2(4): 347-56.
14. Scott, A. H. 1968. Census U.S.A.: Fact finding for the American people. 1790-1970. New York: Seabury Press.
15. Thernstrom, S. 1964. Poverty and progress: Social mobility in a nineteenth-century city. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. U.S. Census Bureau. 1975. Historical statistics of the United States: Colonial times to 1970. Series B67-98. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
17. U.S. Census Office. 1882. Report of the Superintendent of the Census. November I. 1881. Washington. D.C.: GPO.
18. U.S. Census Office 1883. The tenth census of the United States: 1880. Statistics of population. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
19. U.S. Census Office. 1895. The eleventh census of the United States: 1890. Population. Part I. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
20. Walker, F. A. 1888. The eleventh census of the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2: 136-61.
21. Wright, C. D., and W. Hunt. 1900. The history and growth of the United States census. Washington, D.C.: GPO.