Developing local police and federal law enforcement partnerships: G.r.e.a.t. as a case study of policy implementation

Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 145-168

  Winfree Jr , L Thomas ^a   Lynskey, Dana Peterson ^a   Maupin, James R ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038259121     PISSN: 07340168     EISSN: 15563839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073401689902400203     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bardach, E. (1980). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
3. Derthick, M. (1970). The influence of federal grants: Public assistance in Massachusetts. Washington, DC: Brookings.
4. Elmore, R. (1982). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. In W. Williams (Ed.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues (pp. 18-35). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
5. Esbensen, F.-A. (1995, March). The national evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T) program: An overview. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Boston, MA.
6. Esbensen, F.-A., & Osgood, D. W. (1997). National evaluation of G.R.E.A.T. Research in BriefWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7. Goggin, M. (1987). Policy design and the politics of implementation. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Press.
8. Goggin M., Bowman, A. O'M., Lester, J. P., & O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott.
9. G.R.E.A.T. mission statement (1994, May). G.R.E.A.T News, 3, 1.
10. Humphrey, K. R., & Baker, P. R. (1994). The GREAT program: Gang Resistance Education and Training. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 63(9), 14.
11. Ingram, H. (1990). Implementation: A review and suggested framework. In N. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 462-480). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
12. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
13. Magaw, J. W. (1995). ATF's role in a GREAT program. The Police Chief, 62(5), 8.
14. Matland, R. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Policy, 5(2), 145-174.
15. Maupin, J. R. (1993). Risk classification systems and the provision of juvenile aftercare. Crime & Delinquency, 39(1), 90-105.
16. Maynard-Moody, S., Musheno, M., & Palumbo, D. (1990). Street-wise social policy: Resolving the dilemma of street-level influence and successful implementation. Western Political Quarterly, 43(4), 833-848.
17. O'Toole, L., Jr. (1986). Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: An assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 181-210.
18. Palumbo, D. J., & Ferguson, J. L. (1995). Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT): Is the impact the same as that of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)?Evaluation Review, 19, 597-619.
19. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: The police. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Roberg, R. R., & Kuykendall, J. (1993). Police and society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
21. Romczek, B. S., & Johnston, J. M. (1999). Reforming Medicaid through contracting: The nexus of implementation and organizational culture. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 107-139.
22. Sanders, O. (n.d.). Dare to find out more. Wellington, New Zealand: DARE New Zealand.
23. U.S. Department of Treasury. (n.d.). Ask the Phoenix police chief how the fight against youth gangs is going and he will give you a one word answer: Great [G.R.E.A.T. Brochure]. Washington, DC: Author.
24. Van Meter, D., & Van Horn, C. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 445-488.
25. Walker, S. (1992). The police in America: An introduction. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26. Williams, W. (1980). The implementation perspective: A guide for managing social service delivery programs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27. Winfree, L. T., Jr., Esbensen, F.-A., & Osgood, D. W. (1996). Evaluating a school-based gang-prevention program: A theoretical perspective. Evaluation Review, 20(2), 181-203.
28. Zatz, M. S. (1987). Chicano youth gangs and crime: The creation of a moral panic. Contemporary Crises, 11, 129-158.