Maximizing metadata: Exploring the EAD-MARC relationship

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 71-76

  Wisser, Katherine M ^a   Roper, Jennifer O'Brien ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038239373     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.47n2.71     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Association of Research Libraries. 2001. Building on strength: Developing an ARL agenda for special collections. In A proposed action agenda for special collections. Accessed Aug. 6, 2002, www.arl.org/special/action.html.
2. Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivists. 1999. Encoded archival description application guidelines, version 1.0. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 6.
3. Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivists. 1998. Encoded archival description tag library, version 1.0. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
4. Hensen, Steven L. 1989. Archives, personal papers, and manuscripts: A cataloging manual for archival repositories, historical societies, and manuscript libraries. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
5. St. Pierre, Margaret, and William P. LaPlant, Jr. 1998. Issues in crosswalking content metadata standards. Bethesda, Md.: National Information Standards Organization. Accessed Feb. 20, 2003, www.niso.org/press/whitepapers/crsswalk.html.
6. Woodley, Mary. 2000. Crosswalks: The path to universal access?" In Introduction to metadata: Pathways to digital information, Murtha Baca ed. Los Angeles: Getty Institute. Accessed Feb. 20, 2003, www.getty.edu/research/institute/standards/intrometadata/2_articles/woodley/inde x.html.