Individual differences in typical intellectual engagement;Interindividuelle unterschiede im typischen intellektuellen engagement

Diagnostica

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 49-60

  Wilhelm, Oliver ^a   Schulze, Ralf ^b   Schmiedek, Florian ^c   Süß, Heinz Martin ^d  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^d OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intellectual engagement; Intelligence; Maximal and typical behavior; School grades

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038238368     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.49     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence. Vol. 4: Theories of intelligence (pp. 1-27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2. Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 229-259.
3. Ackerman, P. L. & Goff, M. (1994). Typical intellectual engagement and personality: Reply to Rocklin (1994). Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 150-153.
4. Ackerman, P. L. & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
5. Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F. & Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147-154.
6. Borgatta, E. F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 12, 8-17.
7. Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. J., Fitzgerald, P. F. & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A. & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
9. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10. Christal. R. E. (1994). Non-cognitive research involving systems of testing and learning. Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U. S. Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
11. Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564-570.
12. Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality and five factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Dennis, M. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Beatty, P. (2000). The construction of "user-friendly" tests of cognitive functioning: A synthesis of maximal- and typical-performance measurement philosophies. Intelligence, 28, 193-211.
15. Digman, J. M. & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Reanalysis and comparison of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149-170.
16. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V. & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405.
17. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
18. Goff, M. Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537-552.
19. Gough, H. G. & Weinert, A. B (1988). Deutscher CPI. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
20. Hertzog, C., Park, D. C., Morrell, R. W. & Martin, M. (2000). Ask and ye shall receive: Behavioral specificity in the accuracy of subjective memory complaints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 257-275.
21. Humphreys, L. & Yao, G. (2002). Prediction of graduate major from cognitive and self-report test scores obtained during the high school years. Psychological Reports, 90, 3-30.
22. Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M. & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur Text. BIS-Test, Form 4. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
23. Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C Model. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311-334.
24. Johnson, J. A. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five factor model with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563-576.
25. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
27. Kano, Y. & Harada, A. (2000). Stepwise variable selection in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 65, 7-22.
28. McGlynn, S. M. & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 143-205.
29. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes. Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 775-782.
30. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (1994). Reflections on different labels for factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 341-349.
31. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (in Vorbereitung). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, revidierte Form (NEO-PI-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
32. Paulhus, D. L., Lysy, D. C. & Yik, M. S. M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 525-554.
33. Peabody, D. & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structure from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 384-403.
34. Reason, J. T. (1993). Self-report questionnaires in cognitive psychology: have they delivered the goods? In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (pp. 152-170). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. Riemann, R. (1996). Konstruktion und Validierung eines Inventars zur Erfassung von Persönlichkeits-Fähigkeiten. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 17, 222-235.
36. Rindermann, H. & Neubauer, A. C. (2000). Informationsverar-beitungsgeschwindigkeit und Schulerfolg: Weisen basale Maße der Intelligenz prädiktive Validität auf? Diagnostica, 46, 8-17.
37. Rocklin, T. (1994). Relation between typical intellectual engagement and openness: Comment on Goff and Ackerman (1992). Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 145-149.
38. Rolfhus, E. L. & Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Self-report knowledge: At the crossroads of ability, interest, and personality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 174-188.
39. Saucier, G. (1992). Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing. European Journal of Personality, 6, 381-386.
40. Schafer, J. L. & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
41. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Penguin Books.
42. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N. & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
43. Süß, H.-M. (2001 ). Prädiktive Validität der Intelligenz im schulischen und außerschulischen Bereich. In E. Stern & J. Guthke (Hrsg.), Perspektiven der Intelligenzforschung. Ein Lehrbuch für Fortgeschrittene (S. 109-135). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publisher.
44. Sü, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O. & Schulze, R. (2002). Working Memory Capacity Explains Reasoning Ability - and a Little bit More. Intelligence, 30, 261-288.
45. Süß, H.-M. & Schweickert, S. (2001). Untersuchungen zur Konstruktvalidität von Intelligenz- und Aufmerksamkeitstests. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, Lehrstuhl Psychologie II.
46. Trapnell, P. D. (1994). Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8, 273-290.
47. Tupes, E. C. & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
48. Weis, S. & Süß, H.-M. (2002). Facets of social intelligence and its relationship to abstract intelligence. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, Lehrstuhl Psychologie.
49. Wilhelm, O. (2000). Psychologie des schlussfolgernden Denkens: Differentialpsychologische Prüfung von Strukturüberlegungen. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.