Selective attention and the spatio-temporal structure of Orthopteran choruses

Behaviour

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-26

  Greenfield, Michael D ^a   Snedden, W Andrew ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038222466     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853903763999863     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boatright-Horowitz, S.L., Horowitz, S.S. & Simmons, A.M. (2000). Patterns of vocal interactions in a bullfrog (Rana catesbiana) chorus: preferentially responding to far neighbors. - Ethology 106, p. 701-712.
2. Buck, J., Buck, E., Case, J.F. & Hanson, F.E. (1981). Control of flashing in fireflies. V. Pacemaker synchronization in Pteroptyx cribellata. - J. Comp. Physiol. A 144, p. 287-298.
3. Duijm, M. (1990). On some song characteristics in Ephippiger (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) and their geographic variation. - Nethl. J. Zool. 40, p. 428-453.
4. Forrest, T.G. (1994). From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. - Am. Zool. 34, p. 644-654.
5. Greenfield, M.D. (1988). Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids, Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. - Anim. Behav. 36, p. 684-695.
6. _ _ (1994a). Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. & Syst. 25, p. 97-126.
7. _ _ (1994b). Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans: common mechanisms and diverse functions. - Am. Zool. 34, p. 605-615.
8. _ _ (1997). Sexual selection and the evolution of advertisement signals. - In: Perspectives in ethology, volume 5, Communication (D.H. Owings, M.D. Beecher & N.S. Thompson, eds). Plenum Press, New York, p. 145-177.
9. _ _ (2002). Signalers and receivers: Mechanisms and evolution of Arthropod communication. - Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
10. _ _ & Rand, A.S. (2000). Frogs have rules: selective attention algorithms regulate chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae). - Ethology 106, p. 331-347.
11. _ _ & Roizen, I. (1993). Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice. - Nature 364, p. 618-620.
12. _ _, Tourtellot, M.K. & Snedden, W.A. (1997). Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing. - Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 264, p. 1355-1361.
13. Hanson, F.E. (1978). Comparative studies of firefly pacemakers. - Fed. Proc. 37, p. 2158-2164.
14. Hartley, J.C. & Warne, A.C. (1984). Taxonomy of the Ephippiger ephippiger complex (ephippiger, cruciger, and cunii), with special reference to the mechanics of copulation. - Eos 60, p. 43-54.
15. Jia, F.-Y., Greenfield, M.D. & Collins, R.D. (2001). Ultrasonic signal competition among wax moths. - J. Insect Behav. 14, p. 19-34.
16. Krauth, J. (1988). Distribution-free statistics: An application-oriented Approach. - Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Minckley, R.L. & Greenfield, M.D. (1995). Psychoacoustics of female phonotaxis and the evolution of male signal interactions in Orthoptera. - Ethol. Ecol. & Evol. 7, p. 235-243.
18. _ _, _ _ & Tourtellot, M.K. (1995). Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition. - Anim. Behav. 50, p. 579-594.
19. Pollack, G.S. (1988). Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. - J. Neuroscience 8, p. 2635-2639.
20. _ _ (1998). Neural processing of acoustic signals. - In: Handbook of auditory research, Vol. 10; Comparative hearing: Insects (Hoy, R.R., Popper, A.N. & Fay, R.R., eds). Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 139-196.
21. Römer, H. (1993). Environmental and biological constraints for the evolution of long-range signaling and hearing in acoustic insects. - Philo. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 340, p. 179-185.
22. _ _ & Krusch, M. (2000). A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). - J. Comp. Physiol. A 186, p. 181-191.
23. _ _, Bailey, W.J. & Dadour, I.R. (1989). Insect hearing in the field. 3. masking by noise. - J. Comp. Physiol. A 164, p. 609-620.
24. Schwartz, J.J. (1991). Why stop calling? A study of unison bout singing in a neotropical treefrog. - Anim. Behav. 42, p. 565-578.
25. _ _ & Gerhardt, H.C. (1989). Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian. - J. Comp. Physiol. A 166, p. 37-41.
26. Shelly, T.E. & Greenfield, M.D. (1989). Satellites and transients: ecological constraints on alternative mating tactics in male grasshoppers. - Behaviour 109, p. 200-221.
27. Snedden, W.A. & Greenfield, M.D. (1998). Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses. - Anim. Behav. 56, p. 1091-1098.
28. _ _, _ _ & Jang, Y. (1998). Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: Who listens to whom? - Behav. Ecol. & Sociobiol. 43, p. 59-66.
29. West-Eberhard, M.J. (1984). Sexual selection, competitive communication, and species- specific signals in insects. - In: Insect communication (T. Lewis, ed.). Academic Press, London, U.K., p. 283-324.
30. nd ed. - Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
31. Zurek. (1987). The precedence effect. - In: Directional hearing (W.A. Yost & G. Gourevitch, eds). Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 85-105.