Trade liberalization, poverty and efficient equity

Journal of Development Economics

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-128

  Harrison, Glenn W ^a   Rutherford, Thomas F ^b   Tarr, David G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Efficient equity; Poverty; Trade liberalization

Indexed keywords

EQUITY; LOW INCOME POPULATION; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; WELFARE IMPACT;

TURKEY;

EID: 0038218256     PISSN: 03043878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00135-9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2 244-263.
2. Ballard, C. L. (1988). The marginal efficiency cost of redistribution. American Economic Review, 78(5), 1019-1033.
3. Ballard, C. L., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J. (1985). A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Böhringer, C., Rutherford, T.F., 2000. "Decomposing the Cost of Kyoto: A Global CGE Analysis of Multilateral Policy Impacts," ZEW Discussion Paper 00-11, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim. Available at http://dmsweb.badm.sc.edu/glenn/Decomp.pdf
5. Coller, M., Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F. (1996). Efficient equity: removing salary discrimination by meeting statistical legal constraints at least cost. Economics Letters, 52 81-88.
6. De Melo, J., Tarr, D. (1992). A General Equilibrium Analysis of US Foreign Trade Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. De Santis, R. A. (2000). The impact of a customs union with the EU on Turkey's welfare, employment and income distribution: an AGE model with alternative labour market structures. Journal of Economic Integration, 15(2), 195-238.
8. De Santis, R., Ozhan, H.G., 1994. A Social Accounting Matrix for Turkey 1990. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Warwick.
9. De Santis, R., Ozhan, H. G. (1997). Social accounting matrix for Turkey 1990. Economic Systems Research, 9 281-285.
10. Donaldson, D., Weymark, J. (1980). A single-parameter generalisation of the Gini indices of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 22 67-86.
11. Fougère, M., Mérette, M. (2000). Population aging, intergenerational equity, and growth: analysis with an endogenous growth overlapping-generations model. In G. Harrison, S. E. Jensen, L. P. Pedersen, T. F. Rutherford (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis, 325-361. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F. (1999). Burden sharing, joint implementation, and carbon coalitions. In C. Carraro (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change, 77-108. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
13. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Tarr, D. G. (1993). Piecemeal trade reform in partially liberalized economies. World Bank Economic Review, 7(2), 191-217.
14. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Wooton, I. (1995). Liberalizing agriculture in the European community. Journal of Policy Modeling, 17 223-255.
15. Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D.G., 1996. Economic implications for Turkey of a CU with the European Union. Policy and Research Working Paper No. 1599. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
16. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Tarr, D. G. (1997). Economic implications for Turkey of a customs union with the European union. European Economic Review, 41 861-870.
17. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Tarr, D. G. (1997). Quantifying the Uruguay round. Economic Journal, 107 1405-1430.
18. Harrison, J., Horridge, J. M., Pearson, K. R. (2000). Decomposing simulation results with respect to exogenous shocks. Computational Economics, 15(3), 227-249.
19. Harrison, G. W., Jensen, J., Lau, M. I., Rutherford, T. F. (2001). Policy reform without tears. In A. Fossati, W. Weigard (Eds.), Policy Evaluation with Computable General Equilibrium Models, 20-38. New York: Routledge.
20. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F., Tarr, D. G. (2002). Trade policy options for Chile: the importance of market access. World Bank Economic Review, 16 49-79.
21. Keuschnigg, C., Kohler, W. (2000). Eastern enlargement of the EU: a dynamic general equilibrium perspective. In G. Harrison, S. E. Jensen, L. P. Pedersen, T. F. Rutherford (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis, 119-170. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Martinez, J., 2000. "Revenue-Neutral Tariff Reform: Welfare Effects of Uniform Tariffs in 13 Developing Countries," Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Colorado; available at http://dmsweb.badm.sc.edu/glenn/Martinez_ch3.pdf
23. Panagariya, A., Rodrik, D. (1993). Political-economy arguments for a uniform tariff. International Economic Review, 685-703.
24. Piggott, J., Whalley, J. (1985). UK Tax Policy and Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
25. Rutherford, T. F. (1995). Extensions of GAMS for complementarity and variational problems arising in applied economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19(8), 1299-1324.
26. Rutherford, T. F. (1999). Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: an overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economic, 14(1/2), 1-46.
27. Rutherford, T. F. (2000). Carbon abatement, technical change and intergenerational burden sharing. In G. Harrison, S. E. Jensen, L. P. Pedersen, T. F. Rutherford (Eds.), Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis, 79-117. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. Rutherford, T. F., Rutström, E., Tarr, D. (1997). Morocco's free trade agreement with the EU: a quantitative assessment. Economic Modelling, 14(9), 237-269.
29. Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality decomposition by factor components. Econometrica, 50 193-212.
30. Tarr, D. G. (2002). Arguments for and against uniform tariffs. In B. Hoekman, A. Maltoo, P. English (Eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO: A handbook, 526-534. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
31. Whalley, J. (1985). Trade Liberalization among Major Trading Areas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. World Bank, (1999). Panama, Poverty Assessment: Priorities and Strategies for Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.