The goldilocks problem

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-11

  Hulubei, Tudor ^a   Freuder, Eugene C ^b   Wallace, Richard J ^b  

^a Univ of New Hampshire   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Configuration; Constraint satisfaction; Heuristics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; HEURISTIC METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; CONSTRAINT-BASED REASONING; MAINTAINED ARC CONSISTENCY; MASS CUSTOMIZATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0038204585     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060403171028     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cheeseman, P., Kanefsky, B., & Taylor, W. (1991). Where the really hard problems are. Proc. Twelfth Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 331-337, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Coombs, C., & Avrunin, G. (1977). Single-peaked functions and the theory of preference. Psychological Review 84(2), 216-230.
3. Felfernig, G., Friedrich, G., & Jannach, D. (2001). Conceptual modeling for configuration of mass-customizable products. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 15(2), 165-176.
4. Freuder, E., & Wallace, R. (2002). Suggestion strategies for constraint-based matchmaker agents, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 11(1), 3-18.
5. Harvey, W., & Ginsberg, M. (1995). Limited discrepancy search. Proc. Fourteenth Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 607-613. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Hulubei, T., & Freuder, E. (1999) The Goldilocks problem. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming-CP'99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1713 (Jaffar, J., Ed.), pp. 234-245, Berlin: Springer.
7. Jampel, M., Freuder, E., & Maher, M. (Eds.), (1996). Over-Constrained Systems, Selected Papers from the Workshop on Over-Constrained Systems-CP '95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1106. Berlin: Springer.
8. Mackworth, A. (1977). Consistency in networks of relations. Artificial Intelligence 8, 99-118.
9. Mittal, S., & Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. Proc. Eighth National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 25-32. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
10. Mittal, S., & Frayman, F. (1989). Towards a generic model of configuration tasks. Proc. Eleventh Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1395-1401. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Sabin, D., & Freuder, E. (1994). Contradicting conventional wisdom in constraint satisfaction. Proc. Eleventh Eur. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (Cohn, A., Ed.), pp. 125-129. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12. Sabin, D., & Weigel, R. (1998). Production configuration frameworks-A survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13(4), 42-49.
13. Wielinga, B., & Schreiber, A. (1997) Configuration design problem solving. IEEE Expert 12(2), 49-56.