Imposing geologic interpretations on computer-generated contours using distance transformations

Mathematical Geology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 969-985

  Zoraster, Steven ^a  

^a Landmark/ZYCOR   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Directional bias; Gridding; Surface modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038196238     PISSN: 08828121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02068584     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Borgefors, G., 1984, Distance transformations in arbitrary dimensions: Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, v. 27, no. 3, p. 321-345.
2. Borgefors, G., 1986, Distance transformations in digital images; Computer Vision. Graphics and Image Processing, v. 34, no. 3. p. 344-371.
3. Breu, H., Gill, J., Kirkpatrick. D., and Werman, M., 1995, Linear time Euclidean distance transform algorithms: IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v. 17, no. 5, p. 529-533.
4. Clarkson, K. L., 1987, Approximation algorithms for shortest path motion planning; Proc. 19th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, p. 56-65.
5. Dahlberg, E. C., 1975. Relative effectiveness of geologist and computers in mapping potential hydrocarbon targets: Math. Geology, v. 7, no. 5/6, p. 373-394.
6. Danielsson, P. E., 1980, Euclidean distance mapping: Computer Graphics and Image Processing, v. 14, no. 3. p. 227-248.
7. Davis, J. D., 1986, Statistics and data analysis in geology (2nd ed.): John Wiley & Sons, New York, 646 p.
8. Douglas, D. H.. 1994, Least-cost path in GIS using an accumulated cost surface and slopelines: Cartographica, v. 31, no. 3, p. 37-51.
9. Fierstien, J. F., and Brewster, A. V., 1992. The shape-assist technique: incorporating stream channel interpretations into computer-generated surface models: Clark County. Kansas, in Hamilton, D. E., and Jones, T. A., eds., Computer modeling of geologic surfaces and volumes: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, p. 27-35.
10. Gonzalez, R. C., and Wintz, P., 1987, Digital image processing (2nd ed.): Addison and Wesley. Reading, Massachusetts, 503 p.
11. Hamilton, D. E., and Jones, T. A., eds., 1992. Computer modeling of geologic surfaces and volumes: Am, Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 297 p.
12. Hohn, M. E., 1988. Geostatistics and petroleum geology: Van Nostrand. New York, 264 p.
13. Jones. T. A., Hamilton, D. E., and Johnson, C. R., 1986, Contouring geologic surfaces with the computer: Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 314 p.
14. Kushnir, G., and Yarus, J. M., 1992, Modeling anisotropy in computer mapping of geologic data, in Hamilton, D. E., and Jones, T., eds., Computer modeling of geologic surfaces and volumes: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, p. 75-92.
15. Mitchell, J. S. B., 1988, An algorithmic approach to some problems in terrain navigation: Artificial Intelligence, v. 37. no. 3. p. 171-201.
16. Ragnemalm, I., 1993, The Euchdean distance transform in arbitrary dimensions: Pattern Recognition Letters, v. 14, no. 11, p. 883-888.
17. Xu, J., and Lathrop, R. G., 1994. Improving cost-path tracing in a raster data format: Computers & Geosciences, v. 20. no. 10. p. 1455-1465.
18. Xu, W., and Journel, A. G., 1995, Conditional curvilinear stochastic simulation using pixel-based algorithms: Proc. 8th Annual Meeting, Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting. University of Stanford, 46 p.