Rehabilitation in the home - interplay and conflicts between different parties

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 44-65

  Lindqvist, Rafael ^a   Tamm, Maare ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038195847     PISSN: 15017419     EISSN: 17453011     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15017419909510743     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahlström C, Jonsson T (1998). Att arbeta i någon annans hem-ur arbetsterapeutens synpunkt [Working in sombody else's home-from the viewpoint of the occupational therapist]. Boden Univeristy College of Health Sciences (Examensarbete 10 p).
2. Arras J D, Dubler NN (1994). Bringing the hospital home. Ethical and social implications of high-tech home care. Hastings Centre Report 24: 19-28.
3. Beilner A-L (1997). Professionalization and rehabilitation. The case of Swedish occupational and physical therapists. (Diss.) Linköping University, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No 166.
4. Berg E (1994). Public work in the home of the private individual. Luleå University of Technology, Research report, Department of Human Work Sciences.
5. Bergman B (1989). Being a physiotherapist. Professional role, utilization of time and vocational strategies. Umeå University, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (diss.).
6. Bowers B J (1987). Intergenerational caregiving: Adult caregivers and their aging parents. Advanced Nursing Science 9: 20-31.
7. Bryggman A, Pettersson T, Töyrä C (1998). Vårdtagarens, anhörigas och arbetsterapeuters upplevelser av autonomi vid rehabilitering i hemmet [The experiences of autonomy of care receivers, relatives and occupational therapists in rehabilitation in a home-setting]. Boden University College of Health Sciences, (Examensarbete 10 p).
8. Bäckström G, Tamm M (1999). Att införa medicintekniska hjälpmedel i hemmet-en kvalitativ Studie om etiska konflikter för [Introducing medical-technical aids in the home-a qualitative study on ethical conflicts facing the occupational therapist]. Umeå University, Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. (Magisteruppsats).
9. Carpenter M (1993). The subordination of nurses in health care: towards a social divisions approach. In: Riska E, Wegar K, eds. Gender, work and medicine. Women and the medical division of labour. London, Sage.
10. Chiou IL, Burnett CN (1985). A survey of stroke patients and their home therapists. Physical Therapy 65: 901-906.
11. Clark PG (1996). Communication between providers and patient: Values, biography and empowerment in clinical practice. Ageing and Society 16: 747-774.
12. Collopy B, Dubler N, Zuckerman C (1990). The ethics of home care: Autonomy and Accomodation. Hastings Centre Report, March/April, 1-16.
13. Davies C (1996). Gender and the predicament of nursing. Buckingham, Open University Press.
14. Delbanco T (1992). Enriching the doctor-patient relationship by inviting the patient's perspective. Annals of Internal Medicine 116:414-418.
15. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1991). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio P, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
16. Eliasson R-M (1996). Omsorgens skiftningar. Begreppet, vardagen, Politiken, forskningen [Varieties of care. Concept, everyday life and politics]. Lund, Studentlitteratur.
17. Eriksson R, Flinkfeldt M (1998). Etiska problem hos sjukgymnaster vid rehabilitering i hemmet [Ethical problems experienced by physiotherapists in rehabilitation in homesettings]. Boden University College of Health Sciences (Examensarbete 10 p.)
18. Etzioni A (1969) The Semi-Professions and Their Organizations: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers, New York, Free Press.
19. Freidson E (1988). Profession of Medicine. A Sociology of Applied Knowledge, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
20. Friedland R, Alford R (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio P, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
21. FSA (1992). Etisk kod för arbetsterapeuter [Ethical code för occupational therapists]. Nacka, Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter.
22. Gage M (1995). Re-engineering of health care: Opportunity or threat for occupational therapists? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 62: 197-207.
23. Gitlin LN, Burgh D (1995). Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: An exploratory study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 49: 994-1000.
24. Hasenfeld Y (1992). The nature of human service organizations. In: Hasenfeld Y, ed. Human services as complex organizations. London, Sage.
25. Hasselkus BR (1989). The meaning of daily activity in family caregiving for the elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 43: 649-656.
26. Helman CG (1994). Culture, health and illness. (3:d ed.). London, Butterworth-Heineman Ltd.
27. Heyman I (1995). Gänge hatt till… Omvårdnadsforskningens framväxt i Sverige -sjuksköterskors avhandlingar 1974-1997 [The emergence of nursing research in Sweden]. Göteborg, Daidalos.
28. HSL, Hälso-och sjukvårdslagen 1982:763. (Health and Medical Care Act). Författningshandbok 1998. Stockholm, Liber AB.
29. Hvinden B (1994). Divided against itself. A study of integration in welfare bureaucracy. Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
30. Johansson R (1992). Vid byråkratins gränser [At the boundaries of bureaucracy]. Lund, Arkiv.
31. Johansson S, Lindell M (1990). Etik ställs mot lag vid vård i hemmet. Personalen offrar sina intressen [Ethics against law in care in the home-setting. Employees sacrificing their interests]. Läkartidningen 87: 2125-2129.
32. Kielhofner G (1995). A Model of Human Occupations (2:d ed.). Baltimore, William & Wilkins.
33. Lipsky M (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York, Russel Sage Foundation.
34. Lundgren K, Sundqvist L (1998). Vårdtagares upplevelser och erfarenheter av arbetsterapi och annan rehabilitering i hemmet [Care receivers' experiences of occupational therapy and other rehabilitation in the homesetting]. Boden University College of Health Sciences (Examensarbete arbete 10 p).
35. Meyer JW (1994). Rationalized Environments. In: Scott R, Meyer JW, eds. Institutional Environments and Organisations. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
36. Murphy R (1987). The body silent. New York, W.W. Norton.
37. Reiser S (1993). The era of the patient. Journal of the Medical Association 269: 1012-1017.
38. Sahlin-Andersson K (1997). Kvinnoyrken i omvandling. Om ändrade gränser och relationer i sjukvården [Female occupations in transition. On transformed boundaries and relations in health care]. In: Sundin E, ed SOU 1997:83 Om makt och kön [On power and gender. Swedish public investigations]. Stockholm, Fritzes.
39. Scott R (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments, In: Powell WW, DiMaggio P, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
40. Scott R (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (3:d ed.). Thousands Oaks, Sage.
41. Scott R (1995). Institutions and Organisations. Thousand Oakes, Sage.
42. Sim J (1985). Physiotherapy: a professional profile. Physiotherapy Practice 1: 14-22.
43. SoL. Socialtjänstlagen [Social Services Act] 1980:620. Författningshandbok 1998. Stockholm, Liber AB.
44. SoS (1993:10). Rehabilitering inom hälso-och sjukvården [Rehabilitation in health care]. Stockholm, Socialstyrelsen [National Swedish board of Health and Welfare].
45. SOU 1997:154. Patienten har rätt. [The patient is right. Swedish public investigations]. Stockholm, Fritzes.
46. Strauss A, Fargerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C (1985) The social organisation of medical work, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
47. Tamm M (1996). Ethical Dilemmas encountered by community-based occupational therapists in home care settings. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 3: 180-187.
48. Tamm, M (1999).What does a home mean and when does it cease to be a home? Home as a setting for rehabilitation and care. Disability and Rehabilitation. 21:49-55.
49. Tamm M (1999a). Relatives as a help or a hindrance-a grounded theory study seen from the perspective of the occupational therapist. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 6:36-45.
50. Watson PG (1987). Family participation in the rehabilitation process: The rehabilitators' perspective. Rehabilitation Nursing 12: 2.
51. Wærness K (1984). The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy 5: 185-211.
52. Yerxa EJ (1994). In search of good ideas for occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1:7-15