|
Volumn 49, Issue 36, 2003, Pages
|
When should a scholar's notes be confidential?
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS;
CARDIOLOGY;
HOSPITALS;
LAWS AND LEGISLATION;
PATIENT MONITORING;
PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;
SOCIAL ASPECTS;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
RESEARCH;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;
HEART TRANSPLANTATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RELATION;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PERSONNEL;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR BIOETHICS;
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL CENTER;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR BIOETHICS;
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL CENTER;
ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
DISCLOSURE;
HEART TRANSPLANTATION;
HEART, ARTIFICIAL;
HUMANS;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PHILADELPHIA;
PROFESSIONAL ROLE;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;
|
EID: 0038188554
PISSN: 00095982
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|