Recognition and importance of restrictions on randomization in industrial experimentation

Quality Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 533-543

  Sanders, Doug ^a   Coleman, Jim ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Design of experiments; Expected mean squares; Factor relationship diagram; FRD; Inference space; Randomization; Restrictions on randomization; Split plot experiments

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTS; PROCESS CONTROL; RANDOM PROCESSES; SAMPLING;

RANDOMIZATION;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 0038187819     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/QEN-120018386     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anderson, V.; McLean, R. Design of experiments; a realistic approach; Dekker: New York, 1984.
2. Bergerud, W.A. Displaying factor relationships in experiments. Am. Stat. 1996, 50 (3).
3. Daniel, C. Applications of statistics to industrial experimentation; Wiley: New York, 1976.
4. Montgomery, D.C. Design and analysis of experiments, 4th Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997.
5. McLean, R.; Sanders, W.; Stroup, W.M. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am. Stat. 1991, 45 (1).
6. Sanders, R.; Leitnaker, M.; Sanders, D. The analytic examination of time-dependent variance components. Qual. Eng. 1994, 7 (2).
7. Sanders, D.; Leitnaker M.; McLean R. Randomized complete block designs in industrial studies. Qual. Eng. 2001, 14 (1).
8. Sanders, D.; Coleman J.; Youself P. The use of FRDs in industrial experimentation. Unpublished training paper, 1995.
9. Wheeler and Lyday. Evaluating the Measurement Process. SPC Press, ISBN 0-945320-06-0.