Changes in scenic quality after harvest: A decade of ratings for six silviculture treatments

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 30-35

  Shelby, Bo ^a   Thompson, Jonathan ^a   Brunson, Mark ^b   Johnson, Rebecca ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Nontraditional forestry; Public perceptions

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH;

SCENIC QUALITY;

HARVESTING;

ESTHETICS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; SILVICULTURE;

HARVESTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILVICULTURE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038187776     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. ANDERSON, L.M., and H. SCHROEDER, 1983. Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning 10:219-37.
2. BENSON, R.E., and J.R. ULLRICH. 1981. Visual impacts of forest management activities: Findings on public preferences. Research Paper INT-262. Ogden, Utah: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
3. BRUNSON, M. 1991. Effects of traditional and "new forestry" practices on recreational and scenic quality of managed forests. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
4. BRUNSON, M., and D.K. REITER. 1996. Effects of ecological information on judgements about scenic impacts of timber harvest. Journal of Environmental Management 46:31-41.
5. BRUNSON, M., and B. SHELBY. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: How does new forestry rate? Journal of Forestry 90(7):37-41.
6. DANIEL, T.C., and R.S. BOSTER. 1976. Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. Research Paper RM-167. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
7. HULL, R.B., and G.J. BUHYOFF. 1986. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. Forest Science 32(2):271-86.
8. JOHNSON R.L., M.W. BRUNSON, and T. KIMURA. 1994. Using image capture technology to assess scenic value at the urban/forest interface: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management 40:183-95.
9. RIBE, R.G. 1989. The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management 13(1):55-74.
10. RIBE, R.G. 1991. A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in northern hardwood forests. Landscape Journal 9(2):86-101.
11. TAHVANAINEN L., L. TYRVAINEN, and I. NOUSIAINEN. 1996. Effect of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forestry Research 11:397-405.