Meeting the information needs of interdisciplinary scholars: Issues for Administrators of large University libraries

Library Trends

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 315-342

  Searing, Susan E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038187510     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Allen, B. L. (1995). Academic information services: A library management perspective. Library Trends, 43(4), 645-662.
2. Allen, B. L., & Sutton, B. (1993). Exploring the intellectual organization of an interdisciplinary research institute. College & Research Libraries, 54(6), 499-515.
3. Allen, N. (1987). Communication arts and sciences. In B. J. Shapiro & J. Whaley (Eds.), Selection of library materials in applied and interdisciplinary fields (pp. 32-42). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
4. ARL Task Force on Scholarly Communication. (1986). The changing system of scholarly communication. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
5. Atkins, S. E. (1991). The academic library in the American university. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
6. Baker, B., & Litzinger, M. E. (Eds.). (1992). The evolving educational mission of the library. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries.
7. Bartolo, L. M., & Smith, T. D. (1993). Interdisciplinary work and the information search process: A comparison of manual and online searching. College & Research Libraries, 54(4), 344-353.
8. Bathrick, D. (1992). Cultural studies. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, 2d ed. (pp. 320-340). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
9. Berman, P. (1992). Introduction: The debate and its origins. In P. Berman (Ed.), Debating P.C.: The controversy over political correctness on college campuses (pp. 1-26). New York: Dell.
10. Berman, S. (1993). Prejudices and antipathies: A tract on the LC subject heads concerning people. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
11. Bloch, R.H., & Hesse, C. (1993). Introduction to "Special issue: Future libraries." Representations, 42, 1-12.
12. Breivik, P. S., & Gee, E. G. (1989). Information literacy: Revolution in the library. New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
13. Broidy, E. (1987). Bibliographic instruction in women's studies: From the grassroots to the ivory tower. In M. Reichel & M. A. Ramey (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for bibliographic instruction: Theory into practice (pp. 86-96). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
14. Butler, J., & Schmitlz, B. (1992). Ethnic studies, women's studies, and multiculturalism. Change, 24(1), 36-41.
15. Butler, J. E., & Walter, J. C. (Eds.). (1991). Transforming the curriculum: Ethnic studies and women's studies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. Capek, M. E. S. (Ed.). (1987). A women's thesaurus: An index of language used to describe and locate information by and about women. New York: Harper & Row.
17. Casey, B.A. (1994). The administration and governance of interdisciplinary programs. In J. T. Klein & W. G. Doty (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies today (pp. 7-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Chu, F. T. (1993). Bibliographic instruction and the scholarship of integration. Research Strategies, 11(2), 66-72.
19. Clark, B. R. (1995). Places of inquiry: Research and advanced education in modern universities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Cogswell, J. A. (1987). The organization of collection management functions in academic research libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 13(5), 268-276.
21. Cox, B. J. (1987). Social work. In B. J. Shapiro & J. Whaley (Eds.), Selection of library materials in applied and interdisciplinary fields (pp. 205-221). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
22. Crawford, W., & Gorman, M. (1995). Future libraries: Dreams, madness & reality. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
23. Cummings, A. M.; Witte, M. L.; Bowen, W. G.; Lazarus, L. O.; & Ekman, R. H. (1992). University libraries and scholarly communication: A study prepared for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
24. CyberStacks. (1996). Available from: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~CYBERSTACKS (April 4, 1996).
25. DeFelice, B., & Rinaldo, C. (1994). Crossing subject boundaries: Collection management of environmental studies in a multi-library system. Library Resources & Technical Services, 38(4), 333-341.
26. Dougherty, R. M., & Hughes, C. (1993). Preferred library futures II: Charting the paths. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
27. Faries, C., & Scott, P. A. (1995). Invisible collections within women's studies: Practical suggestions for access and assessment. In R. AmRhein (Ed.), Continuity & transformation: The promise of confluence (Proceedings of the seventh national conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 29-April 1, 1995) (pp. 409-415). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
28. Farmer, D. W., & Mech, T. F. (Eds.). (1992). Information literacy: Developing students as independent learners (New Directions for Higher Education, vol. 78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Fink, D. (1989). Process and politics in library research: A model for course design. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
30. Fink, D., & Loomis, A. (1995). Meta-learning for professional development. In D. Barclay (Ed.), Teaching electronic information literacy: A how-to-do-it manual (pp. 3-21). New York: Neal-Schuman.
31. Fiscella, J. B. (1989). Access to interdisciplinary information: Setting the problem. Issues in Integrative Studies, 7, 73-92.
32. Fish, S. (1994). Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do. In S. Fish (Ed.), There's no such thing as free speech...and it's a good thing too (pp. 231-242). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Fisher, E. M. (1987). Race and ethnic studies. In B. J. Shapiro & J. Whaley (Eds.), Selection of library materials in applied and interdisciplinary fields (pp. 181-192). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
34. Frick, E. (1992). The think tank papers: Are we in the ball park? In B. Baker & M. E. Litzinger (Eds.), The evolving educational mission of the library (pp. 9-19). Chicago, IL: Bibliographic Instruction Section, Association of College & Research Libraries.
35. Gaff, G. G. (1989). Interdisciplinary studies in higher education. Education Digest, 55(2), 57-60.
36. Gates, H. L., Jr. (1992). "Ethnic and minority" studies. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, 2d ed. (pp. 288-302). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
37. Gerhard, K. H.; Jacobson, T.; & Williamson, S. G. (1993). Indexing adequacy and interdisciplinary journals: The case of women's studies. College & Research Libraries, 54(2), 125-135.
38. Gorman, M., & Holt, G. (1995). The corruption of cataloging (and) catalog outsourcing: No clear cut choice. Library Journal, 120(15), 32-34.
39. Gould, C. C. (1988). Information needs in the humanities: An assessment. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
40. Gregory, R. H. (1987). Urban planning. In B. J. Shapiro & J. Whaley (Eds.), Selection of library materials in applied and interdisciplinary fields (pp. 236-249). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
41. Gunn, G. (1992). Interdisciplinary studies. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, 2d ed. (pp. 239-261). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
42. Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (Eds.). (1992). Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
43. Hurd, J. M. (1992). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries, 53(4), 283-297.
44. Hurt, C. (1991). A vision of the library of the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration, 15(3/4), 7-19.
45. Jayne, E. (1991). Academic jeremiad: The neoconservative view of American higher education. Change, 23(3), 30-41.
46. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
47. Klein, J. T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185-211). Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
48. Klein, J. T. (1994). Finding interdisciplinary knowledge and information. In J. T. Klein & W. G. Doty (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies today (New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 58) (pp. 7-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49. Koch, L. P., & Preece, B. G. (1995). Table of contents services: Retrieving women's studies periodical literature. RQ, 35(1), 76-86.
50. Krikos, L. (1995). BI challenges in women's studies: The Gateway answer. Research Strategies, 13(2), 69-79.
51. Lee, H-L. (1995). Interdisciplinarity, women's studies, and library collection development. In E. S. Moseley (Ed.), Women, information, and the future: Collecting and sharing resources worldwide (pp. 181-186). Fort Atkinson, WI: Highsmich Press.
52. Levy, D. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1995). Going digital: A look at assumptions underlying digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 77-83.
53. Lipow, A. G. (Ed.). (1993). Rethinking reference in academic libraries. Berkeley, CA: Library Solutions Press.
54. Markey, K. (1984). Subject searching in library catalogs: Before and after the introduction of online catalogs. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
55. Marshall, J. K. (1977). On equal terms: A thesaurus for nonsexist indexing and cataloging. New York: Neal-Schuman.
56. Massey-Burzio, V.; Miller, W.; Whitlatch, J. B.; Durrance, J. C.; Ford, B. J.; & Biggs, M. (1992). Reference encounters of a different kind: A symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18(5), 276-286.
57. Mellon, C. A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47(2), 160-165.
58. Mesplay, D., & Koch, L. P. (1993). An evaluation of indexing services for women's studies periodical literature. RQ, 32(3), 405-410.
59. Metz, P. (1983). The landscape of literatures: Use of subject collections in a university library (ACRL Publications in Librarianship, vol. 43). Chicago, IL: American Library Association..
60. Metz, P., & Foltin, B., Jr. (1990). "A social history of madness" - or, Who's buying this round? Anticipating and avoiding gaps in collection development. College & Research Libraries, 51(1), 33-39.
61. Miller, M. A., & McCartan, A-M. (1990). At the crossings: Making the case for new interdisciplinary programs. Change, 22(3), 28-35.
62. Miller, W. (1992). The future of bibliographic instruction and information literacy for the academic librarian. In B. Baker & M. E. Litzinger (Eds.), The evolving educational mission of the library (pp. 140-157). Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries.
63. Mitchell, C. L. (1995). Breaking boundaries: Area studies collects women's studies. In E. S. Moseley (Ed.), Women, information, and the future: Collecting and sharing resources worldwide (pp. 35-38). Fort Atkinson, WI: Highsmith Press.
64. Mosby, A. P. (1994). Coalition building to build collections. Reference Librarian, 45/46, 197-212.
65. Mowery, R. L. (1989). Women in literature: A study of Library of Congress subject cataloging. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 9(4), 89-99.
66. Olson, H. (1992). Subject access to women's studies materials. In B. H. Weinberg (Ed.), Cataloging heresy: Challenging the standard bibliographic product (pp. 159-169). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
67. Patai, D., & Koertge, N. (1994). Professing feminism: Cautionary tales from the strange world of women's studies. New York: Basic Books.
68. Pikoff, H. (1991). Improving access to new interdisciplinary materials. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35(2), 141-147.
69. Pitschmann, L. A. (1991). Organization and staffing. In C. B. Osburn & R. Atkinson (Eds.), Collection management: A new treatise (pp. 125-143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70. Porter, G. M. (1995). Making the interdisciplinary multicultural: Collection building for the new millennium. In R. AmRhein (Ed.), Continuity & transformation: The promise of confluence (Proceedings of the seventh national conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 29-April 1, 1995) (pp. 417-426). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
71. Pritchard, S. M. (1995). Women's studies scholarship: Its impact on the information world. In E. S. Moseley (Ed.), Women, information, and the future: Collecting and sharing resources worldwide (pp. 15-23). Fort Atkinson, WI: Highsmith Press.
72. Radford, G. P. (1995). Characterizing the modern library: Rationality or fantasia? In R. AmRhein (Ed.), Continuity & transformation: The promise of confluence (Proceedings of the seventh national conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 29-April 1, 1995) (pp. 335-340). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
73. Rogers, M. N. (1993). Are we on equal terms yet? Subject headings concerning women in LCSH, 1975-1991. Library Resources & Technical Services, 37(2), 181-196.
74. Ryan, M. T. (1991). Developing special collections in the '90s: A "fin-de-siecle" perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 17(5), 288-293.
75. Ryan, M. T. (1994). Among the disciplines: The bibliographer in the I world. In P. Johnson & S. S. Intner (Eds.), Recruiting, educating, and training librarians for collection development (pp. 99-112). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
76. Schmitz, B. (1985). Integrating women's studies into the curriculum. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.
77. Schor, N. (1992). Feminist and gender studies. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, 2d ed. (pp. 262-287). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
78. Searing, S. E. (1992). How libraries cope with interdisciplinarity: The case of women's studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 10, 7-25.
79. Searing, S. E., & Ariel, J. (1987). Women's studies. In B. J. Shapiro & J. Whaley (Eds.), Selection of library materials in applied and interdisciplinary fields (pp. 250-269). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
80. Shkolnik, L. (1991). The continuing debate over academic branch libraries. College & Research Libraries, 52(4), 343-351.
81. Thelin, J. R. (1992). The curriculum crusades and the conservative backlash. Change, 24(1), 17-23.
82. UTK Libraries - LibLink: Information by subject. (1996). Available from: http://www.lib.utk.edu/ infosubject/ (April 4, 1996).
83. University of Michigan: Diversity librarian. (1996) Available from: http://wurw.lib.umich.edu/ libhome/services/diverslib.html (April 4, 1996).
84. Waite, E. J. (1995). Reinvent catalogers! Library Journal, 120(18), 36-37.
85. Watts, T. D.; Woodsworth, A.; Hibbard, M.; Atkinson, H. C.; & Holley, E. G. (1983). Centralization or decentralization of library collections: A symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 9(4), 196-202.
86. Whitlatch, J. B. (1990). The role of the academic reference librarian. New York: Greenwood Press.