Written versus visual stimuli in the study of impression formation

Social Science Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 278-293

  Rashotte, Lisa Slattery ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect Control Theory; Videotape; Visual stimulus; Written stimulus

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038180844     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00050-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Archer, D. (Producer), 1993. The Human Voice: Exploring Vocal Paralanguage [VIDEOTAPE]. (Available from University of California Extension, Center for Media and Independent Learning, 2000 Center Street, Fourth Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704).
2. Averett, C., Heise, D.R., 1988. Modified social identities: Amalgamations, attributions and emotions. In: Smith-Lovin, L., Heise, D.R. (Eds.), Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. Gordon & Breach, New York.
3. Bastien, D.T., Hostager, T.J., 1993. Generating and analyzing processural data. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 15, 203-219.
4. Chapman, R.M., McCrary, J.W., Chapman, J.A., Martin, J.K., 1980. Behavioral and neural analyses of connotative meaning: word classes and rating scales. Brain and Language 11, 319-339.
5. Couch, C.J., 1986. Elementary forms of social activity. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 2 (A), 113-129.
6. Ekman, P., 1982. Methods for measuring facial action. In: Scherer, K., Ekman, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Methods in Nonverbal Behavior Research. Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Fisher, R.A., Yates, F., 1963. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Oliver and Boyd.
8. Goffman, E., 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York.
9. Heise, D.R., 1969. Affective dynamics in simple sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11, 204-213.
10. Heise, D.R., 1970. Potency dynamics in simple sentences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16, 454-488.
11. Heise, D.R., 1979. Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.
12. Heise, D.R., 1988. Affect Control Theory: concepts and model. In: Smith-Lovin, L., Heise, D.R. (Eds.), Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. Gordon & Breach, New York.
13. MacKinnon, N.J., 1994. Symbolic Interactionism as Affect Control. State University of New York Press, Albany.
14. Osgood, C.E., May, W.H., Miron, M.S., 1975. Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
15. Rashotte, L.S., 2001. What does that smile mean? The meaning of nonverbal behaviors in social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 65, 38-55.
16. Rashotte, L.S., Smith-Lovin, L., 1997. Who benefits from being bold: the interactive effects of task cues and status characteristics on influence in mock jury groups. Advances in Group Processes 14, 235-255.
17. Smith-Lovin, L., 1979. Behavior settings and impressions formed from social scenarios. Social Psychology Quarterly 42, 31-43.
18. Smith-Lovin, L., 1988. Impressions from events. In: Smith-Lovin, L., Heise, D.R. (Eds.), Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. Gordon & Breach, New York.
19. Thompson, K.S., 1978. Contemporary Issues in the Visual Study of Society. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the North Central Sociological Association.
20. Thompson, K.S., Clarke, A.C., Dinitz, S., 1974. Reactions to My-Lai: a visual verbal comparison. Sociology and Social Research 58, 122-129.