Is NETA the blueprint for wholesale electricity trading arrangements of the future?

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 548-554

  Hesmondhalgh, Serena ^a  

^a Caminus Corporation   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition policy; Energy market restructuring; Energy markets; Energy trading and risk management

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ENERGY POLICY; MARKETING; RISK MANAGEMENT;

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY TRADING ARRANGEMENTS; ENERGY MARKET RESTRUCTURING; ENERGY TRADING;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038180775     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810699     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. "Submission to the government response to Ofgem's reports," David Byers, Renewable Power Association, Nov. 30, 2001.
2. D. Currie, "2000 Beesley lectures on regulation," London Business School.
3. "The review of the first year of NETA,", Ofgem, A review document, vol. 1, July 2002.
4. Source: Heren European Daily Electricity Markets.
5. A. Henney, J. Bower, and D. Newberry, "An independent review of NETA,", Nov. 2002.
6. Source: UKPX data-[Online]. Available:http://www.ukpx.com
7. UKAPX data-[Online]. Available: http://www.ukapx.com.
8. Source: Platts UK GTMA Baseload Indices, European Power Daily.
9. Source: OFFER's annual reports and energywatch comparison fact-sheets.
10. Source: Cashout prices: ELEXON, Market prices: UKPX RPD.
11. Source: NGC.
12. D. J. Milborrow, Penalties for intermittent source of energy, PIU Energy Policy Review, Sept. 2001.