Channel design and vessel maneuverability: Next steps

Marine Technology and SNAME News

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-105

  Gray, William O ^a   Waters, Jennifer K ^b   Blume, Alan L ^c   Landsburg, Alexander C ^d  

^a Gray Maritime Company   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

^c U S COAST GUARD   (United States)

^d Maritime Administration   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); MANEUVERABILITY; NAVAL ARCHITECTURE; NAVAL VESSELS; PUBLIC POLICY;

CHANNEL DESIGN; NAVAL ARCHITECTS; SHIP OPERATORS; VESSEL MANEUVERABILITY;

MARINE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0038178424     PISSN: 19453582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aspects of navigability of constraint waterways, including harbor entrances. 1978 Symposium Proceedings, Sponsored by IAHR and PIANC, Delft Hydraulics Laboratory and Netherlands Ship Model Basin, Delft, Netherlands, several volumes.
2. Card, J. C., et al. 1979 Report to the President on an Evaluation of Devices and Techniques to Improve Maneuvering and Stopping Abilities of Large Tank Vessels, U.S. Coast Guard, Washington, DC.
3. Chen, H. C., Lin, W. M., and Hwang, W. Y. 2002. Validation and application of chimera RANS method for ship-ship interactions in shallow water and restricted waterway, Proceedings, 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, July 8-13, Fukuoka, Japan.
4. Crane, C. L. 1979 Maneuvering Trials of 278,000 DWT Tanker in Shallow and Deep Waters, Transactions, SNAME, 87, 251-283.
5. Crane, C. L., Eda, H., and Landsburg, A. 1989 Controllability, in Principles of Naval Architecture, vol. 3, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, NJ, 191-429.
6. Dand, I. W. 2001 Approach channel design: the PIANC approach, Proceedings, International Workshop on Channel Design and Vessel Manoeuverability, May 2-3, 2001, Norfolk, VA.
7. Design Workbook on Ship Maneuverability. 1983 Technical and Research Bulletin 1-44, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, NJ.
8. Gillmer, T. C., and Johnson, B. 1982 Introduction to Naval Architecture. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD.
9. Gray, W. O. 2001 Opinion, MarineLog, 106, 3, 56.
10. Hensen, H. 1999 Ship Bridge Simulators: A Project Handbook, Nautical Institute, London.
11. Hensen, H., de Jong, J. H. 2001 Channel-and port-design, a safe mix of design, experience and training, Proceedings, International Workshop on Channel Design and Vessel Manoeuverability, May 2-3, 2001, Norfolk, VA.
12. INTERTANKO. 1996 U.S. Port and Terminal Safety Study, Arlington, VA.
13. Kijima, K. 2001 Ship maneuverability in narrow waterways, Proceedings, International Workshop on Channel Design and Vessel Maneuverability, October 4, Washington, DC.
14. Kriebel, D. L., Alsina, M. V., Godfrey, M. L., Waters, J. K., and Mayer, R. H. 2000 Design and Maintenance of Deep-Draft Navigation Channels-A Comparison of U.S. and International Guidance, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA, July 2000.
15. Landsburg, A.C., Card, J. C., Crane, C. L., Alman, P. R., Bertsche, W. R., Boyleston, J. W., Eda, H., McCallum, V. F., Miller, I. R., and Taplin, A. 1983 Design and verification for adequate ship maneuverability, Transactions, SNAME, 91, 351-401.
16. MacElrevey, D. H. 1995 Shiphandling for the Mariner, 3rd ed., Cornell Maritime Press, Centreville, MD.
17. Marine Board of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994 Minding the Helm-Marine Navigation and Piloting, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
18. Marine Board of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996 Simulated Voyages -Using Simulation Technology to Train and License Mariners, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
19. Mayer, R. H., Waters, J. K., and Kriebel, D. L. 2000 Design and Maintenance of Deep-Fraft Navigation Channels - An Overview of Current Practice with an Annotated Bibliography, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA, July 2000.
20. O'Brien, T. (in press) Experience using an innovative under keel clearance prediction system in Australian ports, Proceedings, Workshop on Ship Squat in Restricted Waters, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, NJ.
21. Palomares, M. 1994 The role of IMO in setting manoeuvring standards, in 3rd International Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft (MCMC '94), G.N. Roberts and M.M.A. Pourzanjani, eds. Maritime Research Centre, Southampton Institute, London.
22. Panamax Ships Meeting in the Gaillard Cut, Panama Canal. 1999 Report for the Panama Canal Commission by Waterway Simulation Technology, Inc., contract PAP-13405.
23. Panel H-10. 1975 Proposed procedures for determining ship controllability requirements and capabilities, Proceedings, First Ship Technology and Research Symposium (Star), Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, August, Jersey City, NJ.
24. Panel H-10 (Ship Controllability), SNAME, and cosponsored with the Marine Board of the National Academy of Sciences. 1993 Proceedings, Workshop on the Role of Hydrodynamics and the Hydrodynamicist in Ship Bridge Simulator Training, October 22, Washington, DC.
25. Parker, B. B., and Huff, L. C. 1998 Modern under-keel clearance management, International Hydrographic Review, 75, 2, 143-165.
26. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses. 1997 Approach Channels, A Guide for Design, report of the Joint PIANC-IAPH Working Group II-30 in cooperation with IMPA and IALA, Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Brussels, Belgium, and International Association of Ports and Harbors, Japan.
27. Risk management in the Marine Transportation System. 1999 Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 22, National Research Council, March 29-30, Washington, DC.
28. Ship Performance Measurements Houston Ship Channel, Galveston Bay, Texas. 2001 Report for U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, by Designers and Planners and Waterway Simulation Technology, Inc., July 10, 2001, Vicksburgh, MS, contract DACW39-97-D-0001, CD-rom.
29. Silver, A. W., and Dalzell, J. F. 1997 Risk based decisions for entrance channel operation and design, Proceedings, Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, May 25-30, 1997, Honolulu, HI.
30. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Hydraulic Design Guidance for Deep-Draft Navigation Projects, Engineer Manual (EM) 1110-2-1613, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., presently in revision.
31. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1999 "Planning and Design of Deep-Draft Navigation Channels," PROSPECT course, Vicksburg, MS, May 1999.
32. U.S. Department of Transportation. 1999 An Assessment of the U.S. Marine Transportation System-A Report to Congress, Washington, DC, September.
33. Vickerman, J. M. 2001 Shipping trends: implications for vessel maneuverability and channel design, slides presented at International Workshop on Channel Design and Vessel Maneuverability, May 3-4, available at http://www.transystems.com/.
34. Watson, D. G. M. 1998 Practical Ship Design, Elsevier, New York.
35. Webster, W. C., editor. 1992 Shiphandling Simulation - Application to Waterway Design, Marine Board of the National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.