Adverse birth outcomes in relation to prenatal sonographic measurements of fetal size

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 347-356

  Smith Bindman, Rebecca ^a,b,d   Chu, Philip W ^a   Ecker, Jeff ^c   Feldstein, Vickie A ^a   Filly, Roy A ^a   Bacchetti, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Birth outcomes; Fetal biometry; Fetal weight; Intrauterine growth restriction; Neonatal morbidity; Neonatal mortality; Neonatal outcomes; Prenatal sonography

Indexed keywords

GROWTH KINETICS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

NEONATAL OUTCOMES;

ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MORTALITY; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0038177407     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.4.347     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction: the Vermont Oxford Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:198-206.
2. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1234-1238.
3. Craigo SD. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth retardation. Semin Perinatol 1994; 18:292-304.
4. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Sonographic evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:709-717.
5. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984; 150:535-540.
6. Altman DG, Hytten FE. Intrauterine growth retardation: let's be clear about it. Br J Obst Gynaecol 1989; 96:1127-1132.
7. Divon MY, Chamberlain PF, Sipos L, Manning FA, Platt LD. Identification of the small for gestational age fetus with the use of gestational age-independent indices of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155:1197-1201.
8. Nazarian LN, Halpern EJ, Kurtz AB, Hauck WW, Needleman L. Normal interval fetal growth rates based on obstetrical ultrasonographic measurements. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:829-836.
9. Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Ecker J, Feldstein V, Filly R, Bacchetti P. Sonographic evaluation of fetal growth predicts neonatal outcomes. Radiology 2002; 223:153-161.
10. De Jong CL, Francis A, Van Geijn HP, Gardosi J. Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15:36-40.
11. Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD Jr. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:1118-1121.
12. Kurniawan YS, Deter RL, Visser GH, Torringa JL. Prediction of birth weight using the Rossavik growth model: a study in a Dutch population. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25:235-242.
13. Hedriana HL, Moore TR. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1600-1606.
14. Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE. The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:186-190.
15. Sherman DJ, Arieli S, Tovbin J, Siegel G, Caspi E, Bukovsky I. A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:212-217.
16. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth retardation: predictive value of US criteria for antenatal diagnosis. Radiology 1986; 160:415-417.
17. Simon NV, O'Connor TJD, Shearer DM. Detection of intrauterine fetal growth retardation with abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight using cross-sectional growth curves. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:685-690.
18. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ. Effects of symmetric and asymmetric fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:321-327.
19. Smith GC, Smith MF, McNay MB, Fleming JE. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1817-1822.
20. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984; 152:497-501.
21. Hastie T, Trevor J. Generalized additive models. In: Chambers J, Hastie T (eds). Statistical Models in S. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks; 1992:249-307.
22. Savitz DA, Ananth CV, Berkowitz GS, Lapinski R. Concordance among measures of pregnancy outcome based on fetal size and duration of gestation. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151:627-633.
23. Ventura S, Martin J, Curtin S, Mathews T, Park M. Births: Final Data for 1998. Vol 48. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998.
24. Stevens-Simon C, Orleans M. Low-birthweight prevention programs: the enigma of failure. Birth 1999; 26:184-191.