QSARs for endocrine disruption priority setting database 2: The integrated 4-phase model

QSAR and Combinatorial Science

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 89-105

  Walker, John D ^a   Fang, Hong ^b   Perkins, Roger ^b   Tong, Weida ^c  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

EDPSD; Estrogen; Integrated 4 Phase; QSARs; Receptor binding

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

BINDING AFFINITIES; EDPSD; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR BINDING; INTEGRATED 4-PHASE; OESTROGENS; PHASE MODEL; PRIORITY SETTING; QSAR; RECEPTOR BINDING;

ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS;

2 PROPANOL; ACETIC ACID; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ACETONE; ALCOHOL; ASCORBIC ACID; BENZOIC ACID; CALCIUM ACETATE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CITRIC ACID; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; FORMALDEHYDE; FORMIC ACID; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; LACTIC ACID; LINOLEIC ACID; MANNITOL; METHANOL; NICOTINIC ACID; PALMITIC ACID; PHENETHYL ALCOHOL; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; SALICYLATE SODIUM; SALICYLIC ACID; SORBITOL; STEARIC ACID; SUCROSE; UNINDEXED DRUG; UREA;

ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; ECOTOXICITY; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION PRIORITY SETTING DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RECEPTOR AFFINITY; RECEPTOR BINDING;

EID: 0038176189     PISSN: 1611020X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200390009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Walker, J. D., Waller, C., and Kane, S., The Endocrine Disruption Priority Setting Database (EDPSD): A tool to rapidly sort and prioritize chemicals for endocrine disruption screening and testing, Chapter 4, in: Walker J.D. (Ed.), QSARs for Predicting Biological Activities Related to Endocrine Disruption and Environmental-Human Health Interactions, SETAC Press, Pensacola (Florida), 2003.
2. Schmieder, P., Ankley, G., Mekenyan, O., Walker, J. D., and Bradbury, S., QSARs for predicting estrogen receptor binding affinity of structurally diverse chemicals, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, In Press (2003).
3. Shi, L., Tong, W., Fang, H., Perkins, R., Wu, J., Tu, M., Blair, R. M., Branham, W. S., Waller, C., Walker, J. D., and Sheehan, D. M., An Integrated "4-Phase" Approach for Setting Endocrine Disruption Screening Priorities - Phase I and II Predictions of Estrogen Receptor Binding Affinities, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13, 69 - 88 (2002).
4. Hong, H., Tong, W., Fang, H., Shi, L., Xie, R. Q., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Walker, J. D., Branham, W. S., and Sheehan, D. M., Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts, Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 29 - 36. (2002).
5. Shi, L. M., Fang, H., Tong, W., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Blair, R., Branham, W. and Sheehan, D, QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 186-195 (2001).
6. Elsby, R., Ashby, J., Sumpter, J. P., Brooks, A. N., Pennie, W. D, Maggs, J. L., Lefevre, P. A., Odum, J., Beresford, N., Paton, D., Park, B. K., Obstacles to the prediction of estrogenicity from chemical structure: Assay-mediated metabolic transformation and apparent promiscuous nature of the estrogen receptor, Biochem. Pharmacol. 60, 1519-1530 (2000).
7. Anderson, E., Veith, G. D., and Weininger, D., SMILES: A line notation and computerized interpreter for chemical structure, EPA/600/M-87-021, Technical Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth (Minnesota) 1987.
8. Weininger, D., SMILES, A Chemical Language and Information System. 1. Introduction to Methodology and Encoding Rules, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31 - 36 (1988).
9. Weininger, D., Weininger, A., and Weininger, J. L., SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29, 97 - 101 (1989).
10. Blair, R., Fang, H., Branham, W. S., Hass, B., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., Tong, W., Shi, L., Perkins, R., and Sheehan, D. M., Estrogen Receptor Relative Binding Affinities of 188 Natural and Xenochemicals: Structural Diversity of Ligands, Toxicol. Sci. 54, 138 - 153 (2000).
11. Soto, A. M., Justicia, H., Wray, J. W., and Sonnenschein, C., p-Nonylphenol: an estrogenic xenobiotic released from "modified" polystyrene, Environ. Health Perspect. 92, 167 - 173 (1991).
12. Soto, A. M., Sonnenschein, C., Chung, K. L., Fernandez, M. E, Olea, N., and Serrano, F. O., The E-SCREEN Assay as a Tool to Identify Estrogens: an update on Estrogenic Environmental Pollutants, Environ. Health Perspect. 103, Suppl. 7, 113 - 122 (1995).
13. Nishihara, T., Nishikawa, J., Kanayama, T., Dakeyama, F., Saito, K., Imagawa, M., Takatori, S., Kitagawa, Y., Hori, S., and Utsumi, H., Estrogenic activities of 517 chemicals by yeast two-hybrid assay, J. Health Sci. 46, 282-298 (2000).
14. Fang, H., Tong, W., Perkins, R., Soto, A., Prechtl, N., and Sheehan, D. M., Quantitative comparison of in vitro assays for estrogenic activity, Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 723 -729 (2000).