The Effect of Three Types of Rasps on the Occlusal Surface of Equine Cheek Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

Journal of Veterinary Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-27

  Kempson, Susan A ^a   Davidson, Mary E B ^a   Dacre, Ian T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUNGSTEN;

AMPUTATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CEMENTUM; CHEEK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HORSE; NONHUMAN; ODONTOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLID; TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH EXTRACTION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; CADAVER; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALIA; EQUIDAE; EQUUS CABALLUS;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL HIGH-SPEED TECHNIQUE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTIN; HORSES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; TOOTH;

EID: 0038169032     PISSN: 08987564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089875640302000102     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dixon PM, Tremaine WH, Pickles K, et al. Equine dental disease Part 1: a long term study of 400 cases: disorders of incisors, canine and first premolar teeth. Equine Vet J 1999; 31: 369-377.
2. Pence P, Wilewska, K. Mature horse dentistry. In: Pence P, ed. Equine dentistry - a practical guide. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2002; 141.
3. Scratchfield W L. Dental prophylaxis. In: Baker GJ, Easley J, eds. Equine dentistry. WB Saunders:Philadelphia, 1999; 185-205.
4. Dacre KJP, Dacre IT, Dixon PM. Motorised equine dental equipment. Equine Vet Educ 2002; 14: 263-266.
5. Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984; 9: 57-61.
6. Holland GR. Morphological features of dentin and pulp related to dentin sensitivity. Arch Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl): 3-11
7. Brännström, M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88 (Suppl): 7-13.
8. Kilic S, Dixon PM, Kempson SA. A light and ultrastructural examination of calcified dental tissues of horses. 3. Dentin. Equine Vet J 1997; 29: 206-212.
9. Paphangkoralit J, Osborn JW. The effect of normal occlusal forces on fluid movement through human dentin in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 1033-1041.
10. Kim S, Trowbridge H, Suda H. Pulpal reaction to caries and dental procedures. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed, St. Louis: Mosby; 2002; 573-602.
11. Trowbridge H, Kim S, Suda H. Structure and functions of the dentin and pulp complex. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed, St Louis: Mosby; 411-476.
12. Nagoaka S, Miyazaki Y, Iwamoto Y, et al. Bacterial invasion into dentinal tubules of human vital and non-vital teeth. J Endod 1995; 21: 70-73.
13. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability and sensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88 (Suppl): 31-37.
14. Michelich V, Pashley DH, Whitford GM. Dentin permeability: a comparison of cuntional versus anatomical tubular radii. J Dent Res 1978; 57:1019-1015.
15. Trowbridge HO. Intradental sensory units: physiological and clinical aspects. J Endod 1985; 11: 489-494.
16. Ario Santini, personal communication.