Buckling instability induced by polymer solution drying

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 897-903

  Pauchard, L ^a   Allain, C ^a  

^a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038168971     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-00457-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. PAUCHARD L., PARISSE F. and ALLAIN C., Phys. Rev. E, 59 (1999) 3737.
2. ALLAIN C. and LIMAT L., Phys. Rev. Lett., 74 (1995) 2981.
3. BOECK T., BAHR H. A., LAMPENSCHERF S. and BAHR U., Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 1408.
4. GROISMAN A. and KAPLAN E., Europhys. Lett., 25 (1994) 415.
5. SHORLIN K. A., DE BRUYN J. R., GRAHAM M. and MORRIS S. W., Phys. Rev. E, 61 (2000) 6950.
6. ANNARELLI C. C., FORNAZERO J., BERT J. and COLOMBANI J., Eur. Phys. J. E, 5 (2001) 599.
7. CRANK J. and PARK G. S., in Diffusion in Polymers (Academic Press) 1968.
8. PARISSE F. and ALLAIN C., J. Phys. II, 6 (1996) 1111.
9. DEEGAN R. D., BAKAJIN O., DUPONT T. F., HUBER G., NAGER S. R. and WITTEN T., Nature, 389 (1997) 827.
10. PLAZEK D. J. and NGAI K. L., The glass temperature, in Physical Properties of Polymer Handbook, Part 12 (AIP Press) 1996.
11. DE GENNES P. G., Eur. Phys. J. E, 6 (2001) 421.
12. PARISSE F. and ALLAIN C., Langmuir, 13 (1997) 3598.
13. DE GENNES P. G., in Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York) 1979.
14. VINK H., Eur. Polym. J., 7 (1971) 1411.
15. GÜNER A. and KIBARER G., Eur. Polym. J., 37 (2001) 619.
16. INCROPERA F. P. and DE WITT D. P., in Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 1990.
17. DOI M. and EDWARDS S. F., in The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon Press, Oxford) 1986.
18. TIMOSHENKO S. and GERE J. M., in Theory of Elastic Stability (McGraw-Hill, New York) 1961, 2nd edition.
19. LANDAU L. D. and LIFSHITZ E. M., in Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon Press, New York) 1959.
20. Note that, in these calculations, the shell thickness, h, is supposed to be uniform, time independent and smaller than the other characteristic lengths involved in the problem. Moreover, h is assumed to be small enough to consider that the length change due to the curvature inversion (the external curvature becomes an internal curvature) has a low contribution to the total elastic energy compared to the bending contribution.
21. DE GENNES P. G., Eur. Phys. J. E, 7 (2002) 31.