Customer-responsive bulk transmission system reliability performance standards for use in a competitive electricity market

Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference

Volumn 4, Issue , 2000, Pages 2057-2062

  Chowdhury, A A ^a   Koval, D O ^b  

^a Mid American Energy Company   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competitive market; Customer responsive; Point of delivery; Reliability standards; Value based justification

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; MARKETING; RELIABILITY; TRANSFORMER SUBSTATIONS; VOLTAGE CONTROL;

COMPETITIVE MARKET; CUSTOMER-RESPONSIVE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM; RELIABILITY STANDARDS; VALUE-BASED JUSTIFICATION;

UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038153921     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Canadian Electricity Association, "Economic penalties, including customer costs, for loss of service continuity", Report to CEA, SD - 273, July 1991.
2. R. Billinton, L. Goel, "Electric service reliability worth evaluation in power systems", CEA Transactions, Vol. 31, 1992.
3. Canadian Electricity Association Consultative Committee on Outage Statistics, "Instruction manual for reporting bulk electricity system delivery point interruptions", December 1987.
4. Canadian Electricity Association Equipment Reliability Information System, Bulk electricity system delivery point interruptions (1991-1995 Report), June 1997.
5. IEEE Task Force on Bulk Power System Reliability Reporting Guidelines, "Reporting bulk power system delivery point reliability", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3, August 1996, pp. 1262-1267.
6. IEEE Task Force on Bulk Power Indices, "Bulk power system reliability criteria and indices trends and future needs", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 1994, pp. 181 - 190.
7. J. S. Chan and M. B., Hughes, "CEA report: 220D711A: CEA national power quality survey", Powertech Labs Inc. Surrey, B.C., Canada.
8. M. B. Hughes, J. S. Chan, and D. O. Koval, "Distribution customer power quality experience.", IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., Vol. 29, Nov./Dec./ 1993, pp. 1204-1211.
9. "Under-voltage ride-through performance of off-the shelf personal computers," EPRI Power Electronics Application Center, Palo Alto, CA., PQTN brief 7, 1992
10. M. J. Sullivan, et al., "Interruption costs, customer satisfaction, and expectations for service reliability", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, May 1996, pp. 989-995.
11. Electric Power Research Institute, "Cost-benefit analysis of power system reliability: determination of interruption costs - Vol. I: measurement methods and potential applications in reliability cost-benefit analysis", EPRI EL - 6791, April 1990.
12. G. Tollefson, R. Billinton, G. Wacker, "Comprehensive bibliography on worth and electric service consumer interruption costs: 1980 - 1990", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4, November 1991, pp. 1508-1514.
13. R. Billinton, G. Wacker, E. Wojczynski, "Customer damage resulting from electric service interruptions", Volume 1 & 2, CEA R & D Project 907 U131, April 1982.
14. E. G. Neudorf, et al., "Cost-benefit analysis of power system reliability: two utility case studies", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No. 3, Aug. 1995, pp. 1667-1675.