Restricted linear least square treatment processing of heteronuclear spectra of biomolecules using the ANAFOR strategy

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 174-182

  Lippens, Guy ^a   Bodart, Philippe R ^a   Taulelle, Françis ^b   Amoureux, Jean Paul ^a  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Data processing; Resolution enhancement; Triple resonance spectra

Indexed keywords

INTERFEROMETERS; RESONANCE; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BIOMOLECULES;

PROTEINS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0038150143     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-7807(03)00005-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. S.K. Burley, An overview of structural genomics, Nature Struct. Biol., Structural Genomics Supplement, (2000) November issue.
2. Pervushin K., Riek R., Wider G., Wüthrich K. Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;12366-12371.
3. Fiaux J., Bertelsen E.B., Horvich A.L., Wüthrich K. NMR analysis of a 900kD GroEL/GroES complex. Nature. 418:2002;207-210.
4. 13C for assignment and interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of proteins Quart. Rev. Biophys. 23:1990;1-38.
5. LeMaster D.M. Deuterium labelling in NMR structural analysis of larger proteins. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 23:1990;113-174.
6. Sattler M., Schlecher J., Griesinger C. Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spec. 34:1999;93-158.
7. Moseley H.N.B., Montelione G.T. Automated analysis of NMR assignments and structures for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;635-642.
8. Tjandra N., Bax A. Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. Science. 278:1997;1111-1114.
9. Barkhuijsen H., De Beer R., Bovée W.M., van Ormondt D. Retrieval of frequencies amplitudes damping factors and phases from time-domain signals using a linear least-squares procedure. J. Magn. Reson. 61:1985;465-471.
10. Koehl P. Linear prediction spectral analysis of NMR data. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spec. 34:1999;257-299.
11. Hoffman R.E., Levy G.C. Modern methods of NMR data processing and data evaluation. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spec. 23:1991;211-258.
12. Mandelshtam V.A. The multidimensional filter diagonalization method. J. Magn. Reson. 144:2000;343-351.
13. Hu H., De Angelis A.A., Mandelshtam V.A., Shaka A.J. The multidimensional filter diagonalization method. J. Magn. Reson. 144:2000;357-366.
14. De Beer R., van Ormondt D. Analysis of NMR data using time domain fitting procedures. Diehl P.et al. NMR Basic Principles and Progress. 26:1992;202-248 Springer Verlag, Berlin.
15. McGeorge G., Hu J.Z., Mayne C.L., Alderman D.W., Pugmire R.J., Grant D.M. Technique for importing greater evolution resolution in multidimensional NMR spectrum. J. Magn. Reson. 129:1997;134-144.
16. (a) S. Steurnagel, A. Bailly, J.P. Amoureux, V. Munch, P. Koehl, F. Taulelle, Magic Angle Turning of Q8M8 processed by Anafor. Experimental NMR Conference, Orlando, 1999.
17. (b) F. Taulelle, C. Carlotti, V. Munch, G. Fink, P. Bodart, J.P. Amoureux, P. Koehl, Anafor processing of solid state experiments, Experimental NMR Conference, Asilomar, 2000.
18. (c) P. Bodart, J.P. Amoureux, G. Fink, F. Taulelle, Anafor in MQMAS-based methods, Experimental NMR Conference, Orlando, 2000.
19. (d) G. Fink, F. Taulelle, Processing spectra using Anafor, European Experimental NMR Conference, Prague, 2002.
20. (e) Bodart P.R., Amoureux J.-P., Taulelle F. ANAFOR: application of a restricted linear least squares procedure to NMR data processing. Solid State NMR. 21:2002;1-20.
21. Schmieder P., Stern A.S., Wagner G., Hoch J.C. Improved resolution in triple-resonance spectra by nonlinear sampling in the constant-time domain. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:1994;483-490.
22. Knijn A., De Beer R., van Ormondt D. Frequency selective quantification in the time domain. J. Magn. Reson. 97:1992;444-450.
23. suc1 protein sheds light on the hinge region determining the affinity for a phosphorylated substrate J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;12375-12381.