|
|
|
Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 123-154
|
|
How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADDICTION;
ARTICLE;
CHILD;
CHILD WELFARE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PRIVACY;
RELIGION;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CHILD;
CHILD WELFARE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL;
FEMALE;
FETUS;
HUMANS;
MASSACHUSETTS;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PRIVACY;
RELIGION;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
|
EID: 0038146879
PISSN: 03630307
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
