The names of Spain: A study of the isonymy structure of Spain

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 280-292

  Rodriguez Larralde, A ^a,b   Gonzales Martin, A ^a,c   Scapoli, C ^a   Barrai, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS   (Venezuela)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Inbreeding by isonymy; Isolation by distance; Population structure; Surname distribution

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPACT DISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; HUMAN; INBREEDING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPAIN; TELEPHONE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INBREEDING; MALE; NAMES; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; SPAIN; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0038120880     PISSN: 00029483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10209     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barbujani G, Chiki L. 2001. Genetic population structure of Europeans inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms.In: Renfrew C, editor. Archaeogenetics: DNA and the population prehistory of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 119-129.
2. Barrai I. 1971. Subdivision and inbreeding. Am J Hum Genet 23:95-96
3. Barrai I, Scapoli C, Beretta M, Nesti C, Mamolini E, RodriguezLarralde L. 1996. Isonymy and the genetic structure of Switzerland. I: the distributions of surnames. Ann Hum Biol 23:431-455.
4. Barrai I, Scapoli C, Beretta M, Nesti C, Mamolini E, RodriguezLarralde A. 1997. Isolation by distance in Germany. Hum Genet 100:684.
5. Barrai I, Scapoli C, Mamolini E, Rodriguez-Larralde A. 1999. Isolation by distance in Italy. Hum Biol 71:947-962.
6. Barrai I, Rodriguez-Larralde A, Mamolini E, Scapoli C. 2000. Elements of the surname structure of Austria. Ann Hum Biol 26:1-15.
7. Barrai I, Rodriguez-Larralde A, Mamolini E, Manni F, Scapoli C. 2001. Elements of the surname structure of the USA. Am J Phys Anthropol 114:109-123.
8. Barrai I, Rodriguez-Larralde A, Manni F, Mamolini E, Scapoli C. 2002a. Isonymy and isolation by distance in the Netherlands. Hum Biol 74:263-283.
9. Barrai I, Rodriguez-Larralde A, Manni F, Ruggiero V, Tartari D, Scapoli C. 2002b. Isolation by language and isolation by distance in Belgium. Ann Hum Genet (Lond) (in press).
10. Bertranpetit J, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1991. A genetic reconstruction of the history of the population of the Iberian peninsula. Ann Hum Genet 55:51-67.
11. Bosch E, Calafell F, Comas D, Oefner PJ, Underhill PA, Bertrandpetit J. 2001. High resolution analysis of Y-human chromosome variation shows a sharp discontinuity and limited gene flow between northwestern Africa and the Iberian peninsula. Am J Hum Genet 68:1019-1029.
12. Calafell F, Bertranpetit J. 1994. Mountains and genes: population history of the Pyrenees. Hum Biol 66:823-842.
13. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer W. 1971. Human population genetics. San Francisco: Freeman.
14. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233-257.
15. Central Intelligence Agency. 2000. Internet site http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/country.html
16. Crow JF. 1980. The estimation of inbreeding from isonymy. Hum Biol 52:1-4.
17. Crow JF, Mange A. 1965. Measurements of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surnames. Eugen Q 12:199-203.
18. Felsenstein J. 1989. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166.
19. Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Washington.
20. Fisher RA. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of animal population. J Anim Ecol 12:42-58.
21. Fox WR, Lasker GW. 1983. The distribution of surname frequencies. Int Stat Rev 51:81-87.
22. Garza-Chapa R, Rojas-Alvarado MA. 1996. Risk estimation of ABO and Rho(D) incompatibility in persons with mono- and polyphyletic surnames in Monterrey, Mexico. Comparison with other Mexican populations. Arch Med Res 27:243-251.
23. Jobling M. 2001. In the name of the father: surnames and genetics. Trends Genet 17:353-357.
24. Karlin S, McGregor J. 1967. The number of mutant forms maintained in a population. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, volume 4. p 415-438.
25. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Lasker GW. 1977. A coefficient of relationship by isonymy: a method for estimating the genetic relationship between populations. Hum Biol 49:489-493
27. Nei M. 1973. The theory and estimation of genetic distance. In: Morton NE, editor. Genetic structure of populations. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. p 45-54.
28. Pinto-Cisternas J, Zei MG, Moroni A, Anghinetti W. 1977. Consanguinidad en Espana, 1911-1943. Genet Iber (Madrid) 29:163-176.
29. Pinto-Cisternas J, Zei MG, Moroni A. 1979. Consanguinity in Spain, 1911-1943: general methodology, behaviour of demographic variables, and regional differences. Soc Biol 26:55-71.
30. Pinto-Cisternas J, Pineda L, Barrai I. 1985. Estimation of inbreeding by isonymy in Iberoamerican populations: an extension of the method of Crow and Mange. Am J Hum Genet 37:373-385.
31. Relethford JH. 1988. Estimation of kinship and genetic distance from surnames. Hum Biol 60:475-492.
32. Rodriguez-Larralde A, Scapoli C, Beretta M, Nesti C, Mamolini E, Barrai I. 1998a. Isonymy and the genetic structure of Switzerland. II. Isolation by distance. Ann Hum Biol 25:533-540.
33. Rodriguez-Larralde A, Barrai I, Nesti C, Mamolini E, Scapoli C. 1998b. Isonymy and isolation by distance in Germany. Hum Biol 70:1041-1056.
34. Rodriguez-Larralde A, Morales J, Barrai I. 2000. Surname frequency and the isonymy structure of Venezuela. Am J Hum Biol 12:352-362.
35. Rogers AR. 1991. Doubts about isonymy. Hum Biol 63:663-668.
36. Rojas-Alvarado MA, Garza-Chapa R. 1994. Relationships by isonymy between persons with monophyletic and polyphyletic surnames from the Monterrey metropolitan area, Mexico. Hum Biol 66:1021-1036
37. Rudan I, Rudan P. 2001. An insight into the effects of genetic drift in a small human isolate using the surnames of ten generations of the population (1750-2000). Arch Austriacea 85:107-112.
38. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627-632.
39. Stodder J. 1998. Double surnames and gender equality: a proposition and the Spanish case. J Comp Fam Stud 29:585-593.
40. Sykes B, Irven C. 2000. Surnames and the Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 66:1417-1419.
41. Tay JS, Yip WC. 1994. The estimation of inbreeding from isonymy: relationship to the average inbreeding coefficient. Ann Hum Genet 48:185-194.
42. Underhill PA, Shen P, Lin AA, Jin L, Passarino G, Yang WH, Kauffman E, Bonné-Tamir B, Bertranpetit J, Francalacci P, Ibrahim M, Jenkins T, Kidd JR, Mehdi SQ, Seielstad MT, Wells RS, Piazza A, Davis RW, Feldman MW, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Oefner PJ. 2000. Y-chromosome sequence variation and the history of human populations. Nat Genet 26:358-361.
43. Wright S. 1921. Systems of mating. Genetics 6:111-178.
44. Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Ann Eugen (Lond) 15:324-354.
45. Yasuda N, Furusho T. 1971. Random and nonrandom inbreeding revealed from isonymy study. I. Small cities in Japan. Am J Hum Genet 23:303-316.
46. Yasuda N, Morton NE. 1967. Studies on human population structure. In: Crow JF, Neel JV, editors. Third International Congress of Human Genetics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. p 249-265.
47. Yasuda N, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Skolnick M, Moroni A. 1974. The evolution of surnames: an analysis of their distribution and extinction. Theor Popul Biol 5:123-142.