Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a "depth-blind" attentional spotlight

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 81-86

  Ghirardelli, Thomas G ^a   Folk, Charles L ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038115050     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210744     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J. (1990). Focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 112-120.
2. ANDERSEN, G. J., & KRAMER, A. F. (1993). Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 658-667.
3. BASHINSKI, H. S., & BACHARACH, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
4. BOFF, K. R., & LINCOLN, J. E. (Eds.) (1988). Engineering data compendium: Human perception and performance. Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
5. CHEAL, M. L., & LYON, D. (1989). Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 719-746.
6. DOWNING, C. J., & PINKER, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. Posner & O. Martin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
8. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
10. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
11. GAWRYSZEWSKI, L. D. G., RIGGIO, L., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTA, C. (1987). Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of "neutral" cues. Neuropsychologia, 25, 19-29.
12. GELDARD, F. A. (1953). The human senses. New York: Wiley.
13. HIRUMA, N. (1990). Accommodation response to binocular stereoscopic TV images. In K. Noro & O. Brown, Jr. (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design and management III (pp. 249-252). New York: Elsevier, North-Holland.
14. HOFFMAN, J. E., & MUELLER, S. (1994, November). An in depth look at visual attention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
15. HOFFMAN, J. E., NELSON, B., & HOUCK, M. R. (1983). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 379-410.
16. HOLLIDAY, I. E., & BRADDICK, O. J. (1991). Pre-attentive detection of a target defined by stereoscopic slant. Perception, 20, 355-362.
17. HUMPHREYS, G., & RIDDOCH, J. (1992). Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 143-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
18. IAVECCHIA, H. P., & FOLK, C. L. (1995). Shifting visual attention in stereographic displays: A timecourse analysis. Human Factors, 36, 606-618.
19. JOHNSTON, J. C., MCCANN, R. S., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1995). Selective attention operates at two processing loci. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
20. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
21. KWAK, H. W., DAGENBACH, D., & EGETH, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 473-480.
22. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1986). Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 188-200.
23. LUCK, S. J., HILLYARD, S. A., MOULOUA, M., WOLDORFF, M. G., CLARK, V. P., & HAWKINS, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 887-904.
24. NAKAYAMA, K., & SILVERMAN, G. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
25. POSNER, M. I., NISSEN, M. J., & OGDEN, W.C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. J. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. REMINGTON, R., & PIERCE, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 393-399.
27. SAGI, D., & JULESZ, B. (1985). Fast, noninertial shifts of attention. Spatial Vision, 2, 141-149.
28. TREISMAN, A. (1992). Representing visual objects. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum(Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 163-175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
29. YANTIS, S., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 135-149.
30. ZIMBA, L., BRITO, C. F., NORMAN, T., & BROWN, D. (1993, November). The role of 2-D information in 3-D attention effects. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
31. ZIMBA, L., & TELLINOHUISEN, D. J. (1990, November). The covert orienting of attention to stereoscopic targets. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.