DNA ploidy in cervical lesions assessed by computed image analysis: Relation to histopathology

Pathologica

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 88-91

  Shirata, Neuza Kasumi ^a   Nogueira Zerbini, M C ^a   Longatto Filho, A ^a   Sobroza De Mello, E ^a   Arias, V ^a   Nonogaki, S ^a   Ferreira Alves, V Avancini ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervical lesions; Feulgen stain; Intraepithelial neoplasia; Ploidy; Static cytometry

Indexed keywords

DNA; PARAFFIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER GRADING; CELL NUCLEUS; CONSENSUS; DIPLOIDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATHOLOGIST; UTERINE CERVICITIS; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOLOGY; PLOIDY; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ANEUPLOIDY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CHRONIC DISEASE; DNA; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PARAFFIN EMBEDDING; PLOIDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVICITIS;

EID: 0038113281     PISSN: 00312983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 1993;54:594-606.
2. Pontén J, Adami H-O, Bergstrom Dillner J, Friberg L-G, Gustafsson L, Miller AB, et al. Strategies for global control of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 1995;60:1-26.
3. Koutsky L, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, Stevens OE, Paavonen J, Beckman AM, et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial. 1992;327:1272-8.
4. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil (Federal Health Ministery). Instituto Nacional Do Câncer. Estimativa de Incidência e Mortalidade por Câncer no Brasil para 2000. Rio de Janeiro: INCA 2002.
5. Wright, TC Jr, Cox T, Stewart M, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological Abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120-9.
6. Böcking A. DNA measurements when and why. In: Wied GL, Vooijis GP, Rosenthal, DL, Schenk U, eds. Compendium on quality assurance, proficiency testing and workload limitations in clinical cytology. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology 1995:170-88.
7. Böcking A, Striepecke E, Auer H, Furezi L. Static DNA cytometry: biological background techniques and diagnostic interpretation In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, eds. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology 1994:107-28.
8. Kashyap V, Luthra UK. Predictive value of morphological nuclear parameters and DNA ploidy pattern in precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1995;38:193-7.
9. Bibbo M, Dytch HE, Alenghat E, Bartels PH, Wied GL. DNA ploidy profiles as prognostic indicators in CIN lesions. AJCP 1989;92:261-5.
10. Fu YS, Reagan JW, Richart RM. Definition of precursor. Gynecol Oncol 1981;12:S5220-31.
11. Herman CJ. Cytometric DNA analysis in the management of cancer. Cancer 1992;69:1553-6.
12. Bollman R. DNA-cytometry in dysplasias of the uterine cervix. Zentralbl Gynakol 2001;123:206-10.
13. Scully RE, Bonfiglio TA, Kurman RJ, Silverberg SG, Wilkins EJ. Histological typing of female genital tract tumours. World Health Organization, International Histological Classification of Tumours. 2th Ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1994.
14. Lee S, Tolmachoff T, Marchevsky. DNA content analysis ("Ploidy") by image analysis. In: Marchevsky A, Bartels P, eds. Image Analysis. A primer for pathologists. New York: Raven 1994:161-230.
15. Di Bonito L, Falconieri G, Tomasic G, Colautti I, Bonifacio D, Dudina S. Cervical cytopathology. An evaluation of its accuracy based on cytohistologic comparison. Cancer 1993;72:3002-6.
16. Rotteli-Martins CM, Derchain SF, Martinez EZ, Siqueira SA, Syrjanen KJ. Morphological diagnosis of HPV lesions and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is highly reproducible. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2001;28:78-80.
17. Rasbridge SN, Nakagam M. Discordance between cytologic and histologic reports in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Results of a one-year audit. Acta Cytol 1995;39:648-53.
18. Longatto Filho A, Santinelli A, Montironi R. Chromatin texture by computer-assisted image analysis. Pathol 2000;92:94-5.
19. Wagner D, Sorenger E, Merkle F. Cytophotometric studies in suspicious cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1976;20:336-71.
20. Monsonego J, Valensi P, Zerat L, Clavel C, Birembaut P. Simultaneous effects of aneuploidy and oncogenic human papillomavirus on histological grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. B J Obst Gynaecol 1997;104:723-7.
21. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytology diagnoses. JAMA 1989;262:931-4.
22. Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Erozan YS, Wacholder S, Keerman RJ. The Bethesda system. A proposal for reporting anormal cervical smears based and the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;166:1155-8.
23. Nasiell K, Nasiell M, Vaklavinkova V. Behavior of moderate cervical dysplasia during long term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:609-14.
24. Maeda MYS, Di Loreto C, Shirata NK, Shi LWS, Cavaliere MJ, Longatto Filho A, et al. Image analysis of nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio in cervical smears to discriminate three grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Cytol 1997;41:744-8.
25. Hering B, Horn LC, Nenning H, Kühndel K. Predictive value of DNA cytometry in CIN 1 and 2. Image analysis of 193 cases. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2000;2:333-7.
26. Shirata NK, Gomes NS, Garcia EA, Longatto Filho A. Nuclear DNA content analysis by static cytometry in cervical intraepithelial lesions using retrospective series of previous stained Pap smears. Adv Clin Pathol 2001;5:87-91.