Consistency in performance evaluation reports and medical records

Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 141-152

  Lu, Mingshan ^a   Ma, Ching to Albert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EMPLOYMENT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; RESPONSIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; MAINE; MALE; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MEDICAL RECORDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ADMISSION; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; STATE HEALTH PLANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038107234     PISSN: 10914358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Morreim HE. Gaming the system: dodging the rules, ruling the dodgers. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 443-447.
2. Cain JM. Is deception for reimbursement in obstetrics and gynecology justified? Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 475-478.
3. Meskin LH. The noble lie. The Journal of American Dental Association 2000; 131: 556-560.
4. Novack DH, Detering BJ, Arnold R, et al. Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems. JAMA 1989; 261: 2980-2985.
5. Carter MG, Newhouse JP, Relles DA. How Much Change In the Case Mix Index is DRG Creep? Working paper. Santa Monica: RAND.
6. Commons M, McGuire TG. 1997. Some Economics of Performance-Based Contracting for Substance-Abuse Services. In Treating Alcohol Abusers Effectively, Egertson, JA, Fox DM, Leshner AI, (eds). Milbank Memorial Fund and Blackwell Publishers, 223-249.
7. Lu M. Separating the "True Effect" from "Gaming" in Incentive-Based Contracts in Health Care. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1999; 8: 383-432.
8. Carter MG, Newhouse JP, Relles DA. Has DRG Creep Crept Up? Decomposing the Case Mix Index Change Between 1987 and 1988. Working paper. Santa Monica: RAND 1991.
9. Jonkman JN, Normand SLT, Wolf R, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Identifying a Cohort of Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Hospital Discharge and Primary Data. Med Care 2001; 39: 1105-1117.
10. Warren JL, Riley GF, McBean AM, Hakim R. Use of Medicare data to identify incident breast cancer cases. Health Care Financ Rev 1996; 18: 237-246.
11. McLish DK, Penberthy L, Whittemore M, Newschaffer C, Woolard D, Desch CE, Retchin S. Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 227-233.
12. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, Dennis LK, Amini SB, Rimm AA. The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers. Med Care 1999; 37: 436-444.
13. Warren JL, Feuer E, Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lynch CF. Use of Medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence. Med Care 1999; 37: 445-456.
14. Freeman JL, Zhang D, Freeman DH, Goodwin JS. An approach to identifying incident breast cancer cases using Medicare claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 605-614.
15. Solin LJ, Legorreta A, Schultz DJ, Levin HA, Zatz S, Goodman RL. Analysis of a claims database for the identification of patients with carcinoma of the breast. J Med Syst 1994; 18: 23-32.
16. Leung KM, Hasan AG, Rees KS, Parker RG, Legorreta AP. Patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the breast: validation of a claim-based identification algorithm. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 57-64.
17. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, Dennis LK, Amini SB, Rimm AA. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Med Care 2000; 38: 411-421.
18. Du X, Freeman JL, Warren JL, Nattinger AB, Zhang D, Goodwin JS. Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer. Med Care 2000; 38: 719-727.
19. Maine Office of Substance Abuse. Maine Addiction Treatment System Instruction Manual. Augusta, Maine, June 1994.
20. Lu M, McGuire TG. The Productivity of Outpatient Treatment for Substance Abuse. J Hum Resour 2002; 37:309-355.
21. Commons M, McGuire TG, Riordan MH. Performance Contracting for Substance Abuse Treatment. Health Serv Res 1997; 32: 631-650.
22. Lu M, Ma CtA, Yuan L. Risk Selection and Matching in Performance-Based Contracting. Health Econ, forthcoming.
23. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Fifth edition. Pacific Grove: Duxbury, 2000.
24. Rubin DB. Formalizing Subjective Notions About the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample Surveys. J Am Stat Assoc 1977; 72: 538-543.
25. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley, 1987.
26. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 473-489.
27. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley, 1987.
28. Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63: 581-592.
29. Schafer JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
30. Horton NJ, Lipsitz SR. Multiple Imputation in Practice: Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models with Missing Variables, Am Stat 2001; 55: 244-254.
31. King G, Honaker J, Joseph A, Scheve K. Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Review 2001; 95: 49-69.
32. Schafer JL, Olsen MK. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1998; 33: 545-571.