NMR study on the early stages of hydration of a porous carbonate stone

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 21, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 333-335

  Alesiani, M ^a   Capuani, S ^a   Maraviglia, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Pore size; Porous carbonate stone; Relaxation times

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM CARBONATE;

ABSORPTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HYDRATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATERIALS; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDIMENT; SOLID;

EID: 0038106373     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00164-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in Nuclear magnetic Resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954;94:630-38.
2. Watson AT, Chang CTP. Characterizing porous media with NMR methods. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spect 1997;31:343-86.
3. Hills BP, Wright KM, Snaar JEM. Dynamic NMR Q-space studies of microstructure with the multigrade CPMG sequence. Magn Res Imag 1996;14:305-318.
4. Banavar JR, Johnson DL. Characteristic pore sizes and transport in porous media. Phys Rev B 1987;35:7283-86.
5. Allen SG, Stephenson PCL, Strange JH. Morphology of porous media studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 1997;106:7802-09.
6. Callaghan PT. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
7. Borgia GC, Brown RJS, Fantazzini P. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance relaxivity and surface-to-volume ratio in porous media with a wide distribution of pore sizes. J Appl Phys 1996;79:3656-64.
8. Lipsicas M, Banavar JR, Willemsen J. Surface relaxation and pore sizes in rocks - a nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. Appl Phys Lett 1986;48:1544-46.
9. Strange JH, Webber JBW, Schmidt SD. Pore size distribution mapping. Magn Res Imag 1996;14:803-5.
10. Davies S, Packer KJ. Pore size distributions from nuclear magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation measurements of fluid saturated porous solids. I: Theory and simulation. J Appl Phys 1990;67:3163-70.
11. Davies S, Packer KJ, Roberts DR, Zelaya FO. Pore size distributions from nuclear magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation measurements of fluid saturated porous solids. II. Applications to reservoir core samples. J Appl Phys 1990;67:3171-6.
12. Alesiani M, Capuani S, Maraviglia B, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. NMR relaxation in treated marble samples. Magn Res Imag 2001;19:569.
13. Hurlimann MD, Helmer KG, Sotak CH. Dephasing of Hahn echo in rocks by diffusion in susceptibility-induced field inhomogeneities. Magn Res Imag 1998;16:535-9.
14. Borgia GC, Camaiti M, Cerri F, Fantazzini P, Piacenti F. Study of water penetration in rock materials by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tomography: hydrophobic treatment effects. J Cult Heritage 2000;1: 127-32.
15. Borgia GC, Bortolotti V, Camaiti M, Cerri F, Fantazzini P, Piacenti F. Performance evolution of hydrophobic treatments for stone conservation investigated by MRI. Magn Res Imag 2001;19:513-6.
16. Bobroff S, Guillot G. Susceptibility contrast and transverse relaxation in porous media: simulations and experiments. Magn Res Imag 1996; 14:819-22.
17. Kimmich R. Reorientation mediated by translational diffusion as a mechanism for nuclear magnetic relaxation of molecules confined in surface layers. Magn Res Imag 1991;9:749-51.