Orthopaedic assessment in haemophilia

Haemophilia

Volumn 9, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 65-74

  Rodriguez Merchan, E C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Haemophilia; Joint evaluation; Orthopaedic assessment; Outcome determination; Physical examination

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH STATUS; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOINT EXAMINATION; KNEE SURGERY; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0038102269     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.9.s1.9.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pettersson H, Gilbert M. Diagnostic Imaging in Hemophilia. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 56-65.
2. Manco-Johnson MJ, Nuss R, Funk S, Murphy J. Joint evaluation instruments for children and adults with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 649-57.
3. Bond A, Lader M. The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 1974; 47: 211-8.
4. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain: aspects of reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87-101.
5. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127-31.
6. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analog scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45-56.
7. Daum WJ, Brinker MR, Nash DB. Quality and outcome determination in health care and orthopaedics: evolution and current structure. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8: 133-9.
8. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute, 1993.
9. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel Pollard WE, Gilson BS, Morris JR. The Sickness Impact Profile. Conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 393-415.
10. Engelberg T, Martin DP, Angel J, Obremsky W, Coronado G, Swiontkowski MF. Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Instrument: criterion and construct validity. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 182-92.
11. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Angel J, Snapp D, Swiontkowski MF. Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument. J Orthop Res 1986; 14: 178-81.
12. Barr S, Bellamy N, Buchanan WW et al. A comparative study of signal versus aggregate methods of outcome measurement based on the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 2106-12.
13. Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 1983; 17: 197-210.
14. Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989; 5: 559-75.
15. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL et al. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83-A: 1005-12.
16. Maniadakis N, Gray A. Health economics and orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 82-B: 2-8.
17. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The AAOS outcomes instruments. Normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84-A: 208-15.