Public health impact of detention of individuals with tuberculosis: Systematic literature review

Public Health

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 281-287

  Coker, Richard J ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Detention; Jurisprudence; Review literature; Tuberculosis

Indexed keywords

TUBERCULOSTATIC AGENT;

TUBERCULOSIS;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DETENTION; DISEASE CONTROL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PATIENT CARE; PROPHYLAXIS; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; THREAT; TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 0038083205     PISSN: 00333506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00035-0     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Pinet G. Good practice in legislation and regulations for TB control: an indicator of political will. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
2. Anonymous. Evidence: its meanings in health care and in law. J Health Polit Policy Law 2001;26.
3. Ham C, Hunter DJ, Robinson R. Evidence based policy-making. BMJ 1995;310:712.
4. Gostin LO. The resurgent tuberculosis epidemic in the era of AIDS: reflections on public health, law, and society. MD Law Rev 1995;54:1-131.
5. Gostin LO. Public health law: power, duty, restraint. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
6. Anonymous. Preventive services task force. Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the US preventive services task force, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams&Wilkins; 1996.
7. MacPherson DW, Gushulak BD. Human mobility and population health - new approaches in a globalizing world. Perspect Biol Med 2001;44:390-401.
8. MacPherson DW, Guerillot F, Streiner DL, Ahmed K, Gushulak BD, Pardy G. Arrest and detention in international travellers. J Travel Med 2000;7:180-6.
9. Ormerod LP, et al. Control and prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: code of practice. Thorax 2000;55: 887-901.
10. Blankenship KM, Bray SJ, Merson MH. Structural interventions in public health. AIDS 2000;14:S11-S21.
11. Volmink J, Matchaba P, Garner P. Directly observed therapy and treatment adherence. Lancet 2000;355: 1345-50.
12. Lerner BH. New York City's tuberculosis control efforts: the historical limitations of the 'war on consumption'. Am J Public Health 1993;83:758-66.
13. Lerner BH, Rothman DJ. Legal action to ensure treatment of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1999;341:130.
14. Tracy MJ. Legal action to ensure treatment of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1999;341:130.
15. Gostin LO, Burris S, Lazzarini Z. The law and the public's health: a study of infectious disease law in the United States. Columbia Law Rev 1999;99:59-128.
16. Lerner BH. Catching patients: tuberculosis and detention in the 1990s. Chest 1999; 115:236-41.
17. Feldman G, Srivastava P, Eden E, Frieden TR. Detention until cure as a last resort: New York City's experience with involuntary in-hospital civil detention of persistently non-adherent tuberculosis patients. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 1997;18:493-501.
18. Singleton L, Turner M, Haskal R, Etkind S, Tricano M, Nardell E. Long-term hospitalization for tuberculosis control: experience with a medical-psychosocial inpatient unit. JAMA 1997;278:838-42.
19. Oscherwitz T, et al. Detention of persistently nonadherent patients with tuberculosis. JAMA 1997;278:843-6.
20. O'Brien JK, Sandman LA, Kreisworth BN, Rom WN, Schluger NW. DNA fingerprints from Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates of patients confined fro therapy noncompliance show frequent clustering. Chest 1997;112:387-92.
21. Burman WJ, Cohn DL, Rietmetjer CA, Judson FN, Sbarbaro JA, Reves RR. Short-term incarceration for the management of noncompliance with tuberculosis treatment. Chest 1997; 112:57-62.
22. Fujiwara PI, Larkin C, Frieden TR. Directly observed therapy in New York City - history, implementation, results, and challenges. Clin Chest Med 1997;18:135-48.
23. Vincler LA, Gordon DL. Legislative reform of Washington's tuberculosis law: the tension between due process and protecting public health. Wash Law Rev 1996;71: 989-1034.
24. Asch S, Leake B, Anderson R, Gelberg L. Why do symptomatic patients delay obtaining care for tuberculosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1244-8.
25. Asch S, Leake B, Gelberg L. Does fear of immigration authorities deter tuberculosis patients from seeking care? West J Med 1994;161:373-6.
26. Curtis R, Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B, Goldstein M, Des Jarlais DC. Implications of directly observed therapy in tuberculosis-control measures among IDUs. Public Health Rep 1994;109:319-27.
27. Girttler J. Controlling resurgent tuberculosis-public health agencies, public-policy, and law. J Health Polit Policy Law 1994;19:107-47.
28. Kaur B, Bingham P. Compulsory removal to and detention in hospital in the case of notifiable disease: a survey of public health doctors. Public Health 1993;107: 199-204.
29. Anonymous. Health Council of the Netherlands: committee on ethical and legal aspects of tuberculosis control. Compulsion and pressure in tuberculosis control. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands; 1996.
30. Anonymous. The continuing challenge of tuberculosis. Washington, DC: United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment; 1993.
31. Volmink J, Garner P. Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis (Cochrane review). The Cochrane library, issue 4, Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
32. Stern V, editor. Sentenced to die? The problems of TB in prisons in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. London: International Centre for Prison Studies; 1999.
33. Feldberg GD. Disease and class: tuberculosis and the shaping of modern North American Society. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1995.
34. Rothman SM. Living in the shadow of death: tuberculosis and the social experience of illness in American history. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995.
35. Bates B. Bargaining for life: a social history of tuberculosis, 1876-1938. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1992.
36. Bryder L. Below the magic mountain: a social history of tuberculosis in twentieth-century Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1988.
37. Tan L, Altman RD, Nielsen NH. Screening nonimmigrant visitors to the United States for tuberculosis. Arch Int Med 2001;161:334-40.
38. MacIntyre CR, Plant AJ. Impact of policy and practice on the effectiveness of contact screening for tuberculosis. Prev Med 1998;27:830-7.
39. Gushulak BD. Tuberculosis control in refugees-policy and practices. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;9(Suppt 1): S87-S93.
40. Heymann SJ, Sell R, Brewer TF. The influence of program acceptability on the effectiveness of public health policy: a study of directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. Am J Public Health 1998;88:442-5.
41. Khalil A, Sathianathan S. Impact of anti-tuberculosis legislation in Libya on the prevalence of primary and acquired resistance to the three main drugs at a major tuberculosis centre. Tubercle 1978;59:1-12.
42. Steinbruck P. Legal regulations in the field of tuberculosis control in the German Democratic Republic. 2nd regulation for the prevention and control of tuberculosis issued on 15 May 1975. Z Erkr Atmungsorgane 1976;145:126-39.
43. Anspach M. Medico-legal problems in the hospitalization of patients with tuberculosis. Z Arztl Fortbild 1974;68: 417-8.
44. Fairchild AL, Oppenheimer GM. Public health nihilism versus pragmatism: history, politics, and the control of tuberculosis. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1-14.
45. Frieden TR, Fujiwara PI, Washko RM, Hamburg MA. Tuberculosis in New York City-turning the tide. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:229-33.
46. Alpers A, Oscherwitz T, Lo B, Conference Proceedings: Detaining Nonadherent Tuberculosis Patients until Cure: a 50-State Legal Survey. Policy and legal dilemmas regarding refractory tuberculosis patients, Francis J. Curry National Tuberculosis Center; 1996.
47. Ball CA, Barnes M. Public health and individual rights: tuberculosis control and detention procedures in New York City. Yale Law Policy Rev 1994;12:38-67.
48. Binkin NJ, Zuber PLF, Wells CD, Tipple MA, Castro KG. Overseas screening for tuberculosis in immigrants and refugees to the United States: current status. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:1226-32.
49. Buchanan RJ. Compliance with tuberculosis drug regimens: incentives and enablers offered by public health departments. Am J Public Health 1997;87:2014-7.
50. CDC, National action plan to combat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Meeting the challenge of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: summary of a conference. Management of persons exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. MMWR 1992;41:5-71.
51. CDC, Tuberculosis control laws-United States. MMWR 1993; 42:1-28.
52. CDC, Tuberculosis among foreign-born persons who had recently arrived in the United States-Hawaii, 1992-1993, and Los Angeles County, 1993. MMWR 1995;44:703-7.
53. CDC, Recommendations for prevention and control of tuberculosis among foreign-born persons. Report of the working group on tuberculosis among foreign-born persons. MMWR 1998;47.
54. Chaulk P. Tuberculosis elimination and the challenge of the long-term completer. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3: 363-4.
55. Fidler DP. Globalization, international law, and emerging infectious diseases. EID 1996;2:77.
56. Fidler DP. Legal issues associated with antimicrobial drug resistance. EID 1998;4:169.
57. Fidler DP. International Law and Infectious Diseases. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1999.
58. Foreman JrCH. Plagues, products and politics: emergent public health hazards and national policymaking. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1994.
59. Frieden TR, et al. A multi-institutional outbreak of highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. JAMA 1996;276: 1229-35.
60. Frieden TR, Sterling T, Pablos-Mendez A, Kilburn JO, Cauthen GM, Dooley SW. The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. N Engl J Med 1993;328: 521-6.
61. Fujiwara PI, et al. A continuing survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis, New York City, April 1994. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:531-6.
62. Iseman MD, Starke J. Immigrants and tuberculosis control. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1094-5.
63. Kamat SR, et al. A controlled study of the influence of segregation of tuberculosis patients for one year on the attack rate of tuberculosis in a 5-year period in close family contacts in South India. Bull World Health Organization 1966;34:517-32.
64. Rothman DJ. The single disease hospital: why tuberculosis justifies a departure that AIDS does not. J Law Med Ethics 1993;21:296-302.
65. Sumartojo E. When tuberculosis treatment fails: a social behavioural account of patient adherence. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:1311-20.
66. Talbot EA, Moore M, McCray E, Binkin NJ. Tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the United States, 1993-1998. JAMA 2000;284:2894-900.
67. Wilson LG. The historical decline of tuberculosis in Europe and America: its causes and significance. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1990;45:366-96.
68. Gasner MR, Maw KL, Feldman GE, Fujiwara PI, Frieden TR. The use of legal action in New York City to ensure treatment of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1999;340: 359-66.
69. Coker RJ. Uncertainty, civil liberties, and public health. BMJ 1999;318:1434-5.