Estimation of delivered dialysis dose by on-line monitoring of the ultraviolet absorbance in the spent dialysate

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1026-1036

  Uhlin, Fredrik ^a   Fridolin, Ivo ^b   Lindberg, Lars Göran ^b   Magnusson, Martin ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Absorption; Dialysis adequacy; Dialysis dose; Dialysis efficiency; Dialysis monitoring; Hemodialysis (HD); Kt V; Solute removal; Spectrophotometry; Spent dialysate; Ultraviolet (UV); Urea

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIALYSATE; DIALYSATE LEVEL; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

ABSORPTION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS SOLUTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; RENAL DIALYSIS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; UREA; UREMIA;

EID: 0038079282     PISSN: 02726386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00200-2     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Lowrie EG, Laird NM, Parker TF, Sargent JA: Effect of the hemodialysis prescription on patient morbidity. Report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. N Engl J Med 305:1176-1181, 1981
2. Hakim R, Breyer J, Ismail N, Schulman G: Effects of dose of dialysis on morbidity and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 23:661-669, 1994
3. Keshaviah P, Collins AJ, Ma JZ, Churchill DN, Thorpe KE: Survival comparison between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis based on matched doses of delivered therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:S48-S52, 2002 (suppl 1)
4. Held P, Port F, Wolfe R, et al: The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int 50:550-556, 1996
5. Port FK, Ashby VB, Dhingra RK, Roys EC, Wolfe RA: Dialysis dose and body mass index are strongly associated with survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1061-1066, 2002
6. National Kidney Foundation: DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 30:S1-S64, 1997 (suppl 2)
7. National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI Guidelines 2000. Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy, vol 2002. Available at: http://www.kidney.org/professionals/doqi/guidelines/doqiuphd_ii.html. Accessed November 7, 2001
8. Shohat J, Boner G: Adequacy of hemodialysis 1996. Nephron 76:1-6, 1997
9. Collins A, Ma J, Umen A, Keshaviah P: Urea index and other predictors of hemodialysis patient survival. Am J Kidney Dis 23:272-282, 1994
10. Hernandez-Herrera G, Martin-Malo A, Rodriguez M, Aljama P: Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring. Nephron 89:37-42, 2001
11. Elangovan L, Shinaberger CS, Kraut JA, Shinaberger JH: HEMO equilibrated Kt/V goals are difficult to achieve in large male patients. ASAIO J 47:235-239, 2001
12. Santoro A: Confounding factors in the assessment of delivered hemodialysis dose. Kidney Int Suppl 58:S19-S27, 2000
13. Pedrini LA, Zereik S, Rasmy S: Causes, kinetics and clinical implications of post-hemodialysis urea rebound. Kidney Int 34:817-824, 1988
14. Daugirdas JT, Smye SW: Effect of a two compartment distribution on apparent urea distribution volume. Kidney Int 51:1270-1273, 1997
15. Castro MC, Romao JE Jr, Marcondes M: Measurement of blood urea concentration during haemodialysis is not an accurate method to determine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1814-1817, 2001
16. Canaud B, Bosc JY, Leblanc M, et al: A simple and accurate method to determine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration. Kidney Int 51:2000-2005, 1997
17. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Gotch FA, et al, for the HEMO Study Group: Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. Kidney Int 52:1395-1405, 1997
18. Lindsay RM, Heidenheim AP, Spanner E, et al: Urea monitoring during dialysis: The wave of the future. A tale of two cities. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 37:49-53, 1991
19. Garred L, DiGiuseppe B, Chand W, McCready W, Canaud B: Kt/V and protein catabolic rate determination from serial urea measurement in the dialysate effluent stream. Artif Organs 16:248-255, 1992
20. Santoro A: On-line monitoring. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:615-618, 1995
21. Depner T, Keshaviah P, Ebben J, et al: Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:464-471, 1996
22. Sternby J: Whole body Kt/V from dialysate urea measurements during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:2118-2123, 1998
23. Lim P, Lee H, Kho B, et al: Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor. Blood Purif 17:199-205, 1999
24. Manzoni C, Di Filippo S, Corti M, Locatelli F: Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:2023-2030, 1996
25. Di Filippo S, Andrulli S, Manzoni C, Corti M, Locatelli F: On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int 54:263-267, 1998
26. Mercadal L, Petitclerc T, Jaudon M, et al: Is ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency? Artif Organs 22:1005-1009, 1998
27. Schoots A, Homan H, Gladdines M, et al: Screening of UV-absorbing solutes in uremic serum by reversed phase HPLC - Change of blood levels in different therapies. Clin Chim Acta 146:37-51, 1985
28. Man NK, Terlain B, Paris J, et al: An approach to "middle molecules" identification in artificial kidney dialysate, with reference to neuropathy prevention. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 19:320-324, 1973
29. Gordon A, Berström J, Fürst P, Zimmerman L: Separation and characterization of uremic metabolites in biologic fluids: A screening approach to the definition of uremic toxins. Kidney Int 2:45-51, 1975
30. Asaba H, Fürst P, Oules R, et al: The effect of hemodialysis on endogenous middle molecules in uremic patients. Clin Nephrol 11:257-266, 1979
31. Grof J, Menyhart J: Molecular weight distribution, diffusibility and comparability of middle molecular fractions prepared from normal and uremic sera by different fractionation procedures. Nephron 30:60-67, 1982
32. Brunner H, Mann H: Combination of conventional and high-performance liquid chromatographic techniques for the isolation of so-called "uraemic toxins." J Chromatogr 297:405-416, 1984
33. Mabuchi H, Nakahashi H: Determination of 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid, a major endogenous ligand substance in uremic serum, by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr 415:110-117, 1987
34. Vanholder RC, De Smet RV, Ringoir SM: Assessment of urea and other uremic markers for quantification of dialysis efficacy. Clin Chem 38:1429-1436, 1992
35. Vanholder R, De Smet R, Jacobs V, et al: Uraemic toxic retention solutes depress polymorphonuclear response to phagocytosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:1271-1278, 1994
36. Vanholder R, Schoots A, Cramers C, et al: Hippuric acid as a marker, in Ringoir S, Vanholder R, Massry S (eds): Uremic Toxins. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 223. New York, NY, Plenum, 1987, pp 59-67
37. Vanholder R, Schoots A, Ringoir S: Uremic toxicity, in Maher JF (ed): Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis: A Textbook of Dialysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer, 1989, pp 4-19
38. Gal G, Grof J: Continuous UV photometric monitoring of the efficiency of hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs 3:338-341, 1980
39. Gal G, Grof J, Kiss E: Continuous monitoring of the efficiency of haemodialysis by recording the UV transmittance of the dialysis solution. Acta Chir Hung 24:231-239, 1983
40. Fridolin I, Magnusson M, Lindberg L-G: On-line monitoring of solutes in dialysate using absorption of ultra-violet radiation: Technique description. Int J Artif Organs 25:748-761, 2002
41. Keshaviah P, Ebben J, Emerson P: On-line monitoring of the delivery of the hemodialysis prescription. Pediatr Nephrol 9:S2-S8, 1995 (suppl)
42. Daugirdas JT: Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2:295-304, 1995
43. Bland J, Altman D: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307-310, 1986
44. Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP, Luhring D, Emerson PF, Collins A: Clinical evaluation of a new on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 3:374, 1992 (abstr)
45. Kuhlmann U, Goldau R, Samadi N, et al: Accuracy and safety of online clearance monitoring based on conductivity variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1053-1058, 2001
46. Andersson R, Fridolin I, Magnusson M, Ask P, Lindberg L-G: Analysis of the relationship between UV-absorbance and solute contents during a dialysis session, in Monitoring Principles for Haemodialysis. Dissertation 737. (PhD thesis) Linköping, Sweden, Linköpings Universitet, 2002, pp 91-110
47. Bosticardo G, Avalle U, Giacchino F, Molino A, Alloatti S: Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification. ASAIO J 40:M426-M430, 1994
48. Ronco C, Brendolan A, Crepaldi C, et al: On-line urea monitoring: A further step towards adequate dialysis prescription and delivery. Int J Artif Organs 18:534-543, 1995
49. Alloatti S, Molino A, Manes M, Bonfant G, Bosticardo GM: On-line dialysate urea monitor: Comparison with urea kinetics. Int J Artif Organs 18:548-552, 1995
50. Lee W, Tsai C, Huang C, et al: Assessment of dialysis adequacy using the dialysate urea monitor: Preliminary experience of the dialysate urea monitor. Ren Fail 19:789-797, 1997
51. Canaud B, Bosc J, Leblanc M, et al: Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor. Am J Kidney Dis 31:74-80, 1998
52. Marshall MR, Santamaria P, Collins JF: Biostat 1000 and Daugirdas blood-based hemodialysis quantification: Agreement and reproducibility. Am J Kidney Dis 31:1011-1018, 1998
53. Stragier A: Control of dialysis efficiency: A necessity in any renal unit! EDTNA ERCA J 18:2-6, 1992
54. Beto J, Bansal V, Ing T, Daugirdas J: Variation in blood sample collection for determination of hemodialysis adequacy. Council on Renal Nutrition National Research Question Collaborative Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 31:135-141, 1998
55. Gago C, Marco B, Fernandez J, et al: Influence of post haemodialysis sampling on Kt/V result. EDTNA ERCA J 26:15-16, 2000
56. Beto J, Bansal V, Hart J, McCarthy M, Roberts D: Hemodialysis prognostic nutrition index as a predictor for morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients and its correlation to adequacy of dialysis. Council on Renal Nutrition National Research Question Collaborative Study Group. J Ren Nutr 9:2-8, 1999
57. Lowrie EG, Zhu X, Lew NL: Primary associates of mortality among dialysis patients: Trends and reassessment of Kt/V and urea reduction ratio as outcome-based measures of dialysis dose. Am J Kidney Dis 32:S16-S31, 1998 (suppl 4)
58. Ringoir S: An update on uremic toxins. Kidney Int Suppl 62:S2-S4, 1997
59. Dhondt A, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Lameire N: The removal of uremic toxins. Kidney Int Suppl 76:S47-S59, 2000
60. Gotch FA, Keen ML: Care of the patient on hemodialysis, in Cogan MG, Schoenfeld P (eds): Introduction to Dialysis (ed 2) New York, NY, Churchill Livingstone, 1991, pp 101-176
61. Gotch FA, Sargent JA: A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 28:526-534, 1985
62. Barth RH: Direct calculation of KT/V. A simplified approach to monitoring of hemodialysis. Nephron 50:191-195, 1988