Research guidelines for assessing the impact of healing relationships in clinical medicine

Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Miller, William L ^a   Crabtree, Benjamin F ^b   Duffy, M Bridget ^c   Epstein, Ronald M ^d   Stange, Kurt C ^e  

^a LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CARE AND CARING; CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMOTION; HEALING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL MEDICINE; HOLISTIC HEALTH; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL HEALING; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038076022     PISSN: 10786791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (92)

1. McWhinney IR, Epstein RM, Freeman TR, et al. Rethinking somatization - 'Medicine's unexplained problem.' Adv Mind-Body Med. 2001;17(4):232-239.
2. Gampel DH. Boundaries and relationships in psychology and other natural systems: toward a new way of thinking about process. Adv Mind-Body Med. 1998;14:136-150.
3. Foss L. Intentionality, science, and mind-body medicine: the conceptual problem. Adv Mind-Body Med. 1997;13(3):70-73.
4. Illich I. Medical Nemesis: The Exploration of Health. New York, NY: Pantheon Books; 1976.
5. Stange KC. The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practice. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(4):267-268.
6. Borrell i Carrio F. The depth of a smile. Med Encountor. 2000;15(2):13-14.
7. Lewith GL, Jonas WB, Walach H, eds. Clinical Research Methods in Complementary Medicine. London. UK: Harcourt Health Sciences; 2002.
8. Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, Stange KC. Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(10):881-887.
9. Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galjda J, Meredith L, Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25-30.
10. Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction a review. Fam Pract. 1998;15(5):480-492.
11. Swanson K. What is known about caring in nursing science: a literary meta-analysis. In: Hinshaw AS, Feethan S, Shaver J, eds. Handbook of Clinical Nursing Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1999:31-60.
12. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston W, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):796-804.
13. Brody H. The placebo response: recent research and implications for family medicine. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(7):649-654.
14. Harrington A, ed. The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1997.
15. Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:471-476.
16. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226-235.
17. Storey L, Howard J, Gillies A. Competency in Healthcare: A Practical Guide to Competency Frameworks. Oxon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
18. Finnegan R. Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Interconnection. London, UK: Routledge, 2002.
19. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments. Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980.
20. Coburn D, Willis E. The medical profession: knowledge, power, and autonomy. In Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC, eds. The Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. London, UK: Sage; 2000:377-393.
21. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129-136.
22. Costa PT Jr, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(2):322-331.
23. Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. In: Hersen M. Eisler R, Miller P, eds. Progress in Behavior Modification. Sycamore, III: Sycamore Press; 1992:184-214.
24. Adler HM. The sociophysiology of caring in the doctor-patient relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(12):874-881.
25. Thom DH, Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Krupat E, Azari R. Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests. Fam Pract. 2002;19(5):476-483.
26. Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the trust-in-physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;76:1091-1100.
27. Novack DH, Suchman AL, Clark W, Epstein RM, Naijberg E, Kaplan C. Calibrating the physician: personal awareness and effective patient care. JAMA. 1997;278(6):502-509.
28. Epstein RM. Mindful practice. JAMA. 1999;282(9):833-839.
29. Burns DD, Auerbach A. Therapeutic empathy in cognitive-behavioural therapy: does it really make a difference? In: Salkovskis PM, ed. Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1996:135-164.
30. Mercer SW, Reilly D, Watt GCM. The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(484):901-905.
31. Halpern J. From Detached Concern to Empathy: Humanizing Medical Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
32. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kliejnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757-762.
33. Astin JA, Harkness E, Ernst E. The efficacy of 'distant healing': a systematic review of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(11):903-910.
34. Smilkstein G. The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract 1978;6(6):1231-1239.
35. Candib LM. Medicine and the Family: A Feminist Perspective. New York: Basic Books; 1995.
36. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis KM. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(3):438-450.
37. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 1990.
38. Miller WL. Routine, ceremony, or drama: an exploratory field study of the primary care clinical encounter. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(3):289-296.
39. Mishler EG. The Discourse of Medicine. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1984.
40. Wilber K. Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution. Boston, Mass: Shambhala; 1995.
41. Wilber K. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Boston, Mass: Shambhala; 2000.
42. Belenky MF, Clinchy BM, Goldberger NR, Tarule JM. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1986.
43. Candib LM. Ways of knowing in family medicine: contributions from a feminist perspective. Fam Med. 1988;20(2):133-136.
44. Stange KC, Miller WL, McWhinney I. Developing the knowledge base of family practice. Fam Med. 2001;33(4):286-297.
45. De Craen AJM, Kaptchuk TJ, Tijssen JGP, Kleijnen J. Placebos and placebo effects in medicine: historical overview. J R Soc Med. 1999;92(10):511-515.
46. Boon H, Stewart M. Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;35(3):161-176.
47. Rich M, Taylor SA, Chalfen R. Illness as a social construct: understanding what asthma means to the patient to better treat the disease. J Qual Improve. 2000;26(5):244-253.
48. Petrie KJ, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Role of patients view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study. Br Med J. 1996;312(7040):1191-1294.
49. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1999.
50. Kroenke K, Jackson JL. Outcome in general medical patients presenting with common symptoms: a prospective study with a 2-week and a 3-month follow-up. Fam Pract. 1998;15(5):398-403.
51. Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PFM, Bonsel GJ, Aaronson NK. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. Med Care. 1997;35(5):522-537.
52. Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the patient-generated index. Med Care. 1994;32(11):1109-1126.
53. Wolin SJ, Wolin S. The Resilient Self: How Survivors of Troubled Families Rise Above Adversity. New York, NY: Villard; 1993.
54. Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Kahn S. Hardiness and health: a prospective study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;42(1):168-177.
55. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a patient enablement instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):165-171.
56. Antonovsky A. Health, Stress, and Coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical WellBeing. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1979.
57. Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care. 1995;33(4):392-406.
58. Trotter RT II. Ethnography and network analysis: The study of social context in cultures and societies. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC, eds. The Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. London, UK: Sage; 2000:210-229.
59. Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin M Jr, and the Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits. Med Care. 1993;31(12):1083-1092.
60. Green LA, Gorenflo DW, Wyszewianski L. Validating an instrument for selecting interventions to change physician practice patterns. J Fam Pract. 2002;51(11):938-942.
61. Davis-Floyd R, St John G. From Doctor to Healer: The Transformative Journey. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
62. Mandelblatt JS, Fryback DG, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Sep;12(9):551-558.
63. Carson PP, Carson KD, Roe CW. Toward understanding the patient's perception of quality. Health Care Superv. 1998;16(3):36-42.
64. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Harbinder R. Quality at general practice consultations: cross-sectional survey. Br Med J. 1999;319:738-743.
65. Khunti K. Use of multiple methods to determine factors affecting quality of care of patients with diabetes. Fam Pract. 1999;16(5):489-494.
66. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109(2):186-204.
67. House JS. Work, Stress, and Social Support. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley; 1981.
68. Hobfall SE. Stress, Culture and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress. New York, NY: Plenum; 1998.
69. Quinn JF, Smith M, Ritenbaugh C, Swanson K, Watson MJ. Research guidelines for assessing the impact of the healing relationship in clinical nursing. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9(3 Supp):70A-84A.
70. Grembowski D. The Practice of Health Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001.
71. Nadeau R, Kafatos M. The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999.
72. Levinas E. The Levinas Reader. Hand S, ed. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell; 1989.
73. Cunningham A. Healing through the mind: extending our theories, research, and clinical practice. Adv Mind-Body Med. 2001;17(3):214-27.
74. Schumacher EF. A Guide for the Perplexed. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1977.
75. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Med Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.
76. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(23):3027-3034.
77. Coward DD. Critical multiplism: a research strategy for nursing science. Image J Nurs Sch. 1990;22(3):163-167.
78. Miller WL. Common space: creating a collaborative research conversation. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Addison RB, Gilchrist VJ, Kuzel A, eds. Exploring Collaborative Research in Primary Care. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994:265-288.
79. Cook T. Postpositivist critical multiplism. In: Shotland R, Mark M, eds. Social Science and Social Policy. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage. 1985;21-64.
80. Houts A, Cook T, Shadish W. The person-situation debate: a critical multiplist perspective. J Pers. 1986;54(1):53-107.
81. Risjord MW, Dunbar SB, Moloney MF. A new foundation for methodological triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(3):269-275.
82. Erzberger C, Kelle U. Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of integration. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2003;457-488.
83. Kincheloe JL, McLaren P. Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2000:279-313.
84. Mitchell E. Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(3):18-26.
85. MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Metzger DS, et al. What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Pub Health. 2001;91(12):1929-1938.
86. Kemmis S, McTaggart R. Participatory action research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2000:567-605.
87. Macaulay AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, Gibson N, McCabe ML, Robbins CM, Twohig PL. Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement. Br Med J. 1999;319:774-778.
88. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1989.
89. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
90. Barry CA. Multiple realities in a study of medical consultations. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(8):1093-1111.
91. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282(12):1157-1162.
92. Hatch JA, Wisniewski R. eds. Life History and the Narrative. Philadelphia, Pa: Taylor & Francis; 1995.