Copolymerization effects upon the second-order NLO responses of polyacetylene/polymethineimine

Macromolecules

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 3980-3985

  Jacquemin, Denis ^a   Champagne, Benoît ^a   Andre, Jean Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NONLINEAR OPTICAL RESPONSES; POLYMETHINEIMINE; SECOND ORDER MATERIALS;

ADDITION REACTIONS; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; COPOLYMERIZATION; NONLINEAR OPTICS; OPTIMIZATION; POLYACETYLENES; POLYIMIDES; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

COPOLYMERS;

EID: 0038069205     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma021665j     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Thematic issue on Optical Nonlinearities in Chemistry. Chem Rev. 1994, 94.
2. Kanis, D. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 195-242.
3. Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. In Theoretical Aspects of Conjugated Organic Molecules and Polymers for NLO Devices; Nalwa, H. S., Academic: San Diego, CA, 2001; Vol. 9, Chapter 2, pp 63-126.
4. Jacquemin, D.; Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 5076-5087.
5. Clays, K.; Hendrickx, E.; Triest, M.; Verbiest, T.; Persoons, A.; Dehu, C.; Brédas, J. L. Science 1993, 262, 1419.
6. Verbiest, T.; Van Elshocht, S.; Kauranen, M.; Hellemans, M.; Snauwaert, J.; Nuckolls, C. N.; Katz, T. J.; Persoons, A. Science 1998, 282, 913.
7. Morley, J. O.; Hutchings, M. G.; Hall, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5802.
8. Zyss, J.; Brasselet, S.; Thalladi, V. R.; Desiraju, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 658.
9. Morley, J. O.; Docherty, V. J.; Pugh, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1987, 1351-1355.
10. Morley, J. O. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10166-10174.
11. Jacquemin, D.; Champagne, B.; Perpète, E. A.; Luis, J.; Kirtman, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9748-9755.
12. Meyers, F.; Marder, S.; Pierce, B. M.; Brédas, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10703-10714.
13. Allcock, H. R.; J.; S. N.; Ravikiran, R.; Nelson, J. M. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 8026-8035.
14. Allcock, H. R.; Olmeijer, D. L. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 8036-8046.
15. Chandra Jha, P.; Krishnan, A.; Das, P. K.; Ramasesha, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 2873-2881.
16. Jacquemin, D.; Perpète, E. A.; Champagne, B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 432-440.
17. Jacquemin, D.; Champagne, B.; André, J. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 284, 24-30.
18. Wöhrle, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 22, 1969.
19. Wöhrle, D. Makromol. Chem. 1974, 175, 1751-1760.
20. Champagne, B.; Jacquemin, D.; André, J. M. SPIE Proc. 1995, 2527, 71.
21. Champagne, B.; Jacquemin, D.; André, J. M.; Kirtman, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3158-3165.
22. Jacquemin, D.; Beljonne, D.; Champagne, B.; Geskin, V.; Brédas, J. L.; André, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 6766-6774.
23. Jacquemin, D.; Perpète, E. A.; Champagne, B.; André, J. M.; Kirtman, B. Recent Res. Devel. Physical Chem. 2002, 6, 145-165.
24. Kirtman, B.; Gu, F. L.; Bishop, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 1294.
25. Frisch, M. J. et al. GAUSSIAN 94, Revision B.1; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
26. Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. Chem. Phys. 1999, 245, 213.
27. Kirtman, B.; Champagne, B.; Bishop, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8007.
28. Gu, F. L.; Bishop, D. M.; Kirtman, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 10548-10556.
29. Hurst, G. J. B.; Dupuis, M.; Clementi, E. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 385-395.
30. At least at the HF level. At EC level, the limiting factor remains unknown.
31. In this paper, the usual convention has been chosen to describe the level of calculation electronic structure method// geometry optimization scheme.
32. The corresponding optimal HF/6-31G//HF/6-31G and MP2/6-31G//HF/6-31G ratio are 50-75% and 66-100%, respectively.
33. L.
34. In the macromolecule, the limiting factor of PMI becomes delocalization (see section III.A), although infinitely long PMI is very close to the optimal C/N ratio at this level of theory.