An analysis of rotating-platform total knee replacements

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 410, Issue , 2003, Pages 173-180

  Bourne, Robert B ^a,c,d   Masonis, John ^b   Anthony, Mary ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

^c Smith and Nephew Orthopaedics   (United States)

^d LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; GAIT; GRAVIMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATING PLATFORM TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; SIMULATOR; STANDING; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 0038066781     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063562.90853.6a     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Finlay B, Nott L: Kinematic I and Oxford knee replacements: A 5-8 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2:285-291, 1987.
2. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ: Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop 260:170-175, 1990.
3. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al: Mobile bearing knee replacement: Concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431-449, 2001.
4. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC: Cemented rotating platform total knee replacement: A nine to twelve year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 82A:705-711, 2000.
5. Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, Suprenant VA, Jensen RE: Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components. Clin Orthop 273:232-242, 1991.
6. D'Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell Jr CW: Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 386:235-242, 2001.
7. Draganich LF, Pottenger LA: The TRAC PS mobile bearing prosthesis: Design rationale and in vivo 3-dimensional laxity. J Arthroplasty 15:102-112, 2000.
8. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J: The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg 60B:358-369, 1978.
9. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor J: Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Clin Orthop 205:21-42, 1986.
10. Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Borden LS: Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin Orthop 331:151-158, 1996.
11. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC: Total knee arthroplasty using the SROM mobile bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 16:279-287, 2001.
12. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Robertson D: Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 367:201-209, 1999.
13. Lewandowski PJ, Askew MJ, Lin DF, Hurst FW, Melby A: Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and sacrificing mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties: An in vitro comparison of the New Jersey LCS meniscal bearing and rotating platform prostheses. J Arthroplasty 12:777-784, 1997.
14. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams II VG, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA: Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:699-706, 1998.
15. Matsuda S, Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS: Knee stability in mensical bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:82-90, 1999.
16. Polyzoides AJ, Dendrinos GK, Tsakonas H: The Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty: Prosthesis design and early results. J Arthroplasty 11:453-459, 1996.
17. Robinson E, Mulliken B, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Alvarez M: Catastrophy osteolysis in total knee replacement: A report of 17 cases. Clin Orthop 321:98-105, 1995.
18. Sathasivam S, Walker PS, Campbell PA, Rayner K: The effect of contact area on wear in relation to fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 58:282-290, 2001.
19. Schroeder-Boersch H: Joint biomechanics and design of modern knee prostheses: Time for revised thinking! Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:3-7, 2001. In German.
20. Sorrells RB, Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE: Midterm results of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years. Clin Orthop 390:182-189, 2001.
21. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Crane HS: In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screwhome in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:293-299, 1999.
22. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA: In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 345:60-66, 1997.
23. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Keblish PA: Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:706-714, 2001.
24. Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE: Total knee arthroplasty with a mobile bearing prosthesis: Comparison of retention and sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in cementless implants. Am J Orthop 24:223-228, 1999.
25. Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE, Keblish P, Sorrells RB: Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10:216-220, 1997.
26. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ: Knee endoprosthesis: Biomechanical requirements and consequences. Orthopade 29:722-726, 2000.
27. Walker PS, Sathasivam S: Design forms of total knee replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng 214:101-119, 2000.
28. Walker PS, Sathasivam S: The design of guide surfaces for fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacements. J Biomech 32:27-34, 1999.