메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 449-

The discussion section

(1)  Thornton, Jim a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL STUDY; EDITORIAL; ERROR; LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; READING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 0038060440     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.11105.x     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (4)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 0033535808 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers
    • Docherty M., Smith R. The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. BMJ. 318:1999;1224-1225.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 1224-1225
    • Docherty, M.1    Smith, R.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.