The relationship between the soft tissues and the skeletal detail of the mouth

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 728-732

  Wilkinson, Caroline M ^a   Motwani, Manish ^a   Chiang, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Facial reconstruction; Forensic science; Mouth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP; MALE; MOUTH; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SKELETON; SKULL; SOFT TISSUE; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH;

EID: 0038049386     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs2002412     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gatliff BP. Facial sculpture on the skull for identification. Am J Forensic Med and Path 1984;5(4):327-32.
2. Helmer R, Rohricht S, Petersen D, Mohr F. Assessment of the reliability of facial reconstruction, Chapter 17. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP, editors. Forensic analysis of the skull. New York: Wiley Liss Publications, 1993:229-34.
3. Prag J, Neave RAH. Making faces. London: British Museum Press, 1997.
4. Wilkinson CM, Neave RAH. Skull re-assembly and the implications for forensic facial reconstruction. Sci and Justice 2001;41(3):5-6.
5. Krogman WM, Iscan MY. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. Illinois: C.C. Thomas Publishers, 1986.
6. Stadtmuller F. Zur beurteilung der plastischen rekonstruktionsmethode der physiognomie auf dem scadel. Journal of Morphologie und Anthropologie 1922;22:337-72.
7. Haglund WD, Reay DT. Use of facial approximation in identification of Green River serial murder victims. Am J Forensic Med and Path 1991;12(2):132-42.
8. Stephan C, Henneberg M. Building faces from dry skulls - are they recognized above chance rates? J Forensic Sci 2001;46(3):432-40.
9. Wilder HH. The physiognomy of the Indians of Southern New England. Amer Anthrop 1912;14(3):415-35.
10. Gerasimov MM. The face finder (translated from the German by AH Brodrick). London: Hutchinson, 1971.
11. Wilkinson CM, Whittaker DK. Juvenile forensic facial reconstruction - a detailed accuracy study. Proceedings of the 10th conference of the International Association of Craniofacial Identification; 2002; Bari, Italy.
12. Fedosyutkin BA, Nainys JV. Chapter 15: The relationship of skull morphology to facial features. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP, editors. Forensic analysis of the skull - craniofacial analysis, reconstruction and identification. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1993.
13. George RM. Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction. In: Iscan, MY, Helmer, RP, editors. Forensic analysis of the skull. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc, 1993:215-27.
14. Macho GA. An appraisal of plastic reconstruction of external nose. J Forensic Sci 1986;31(4):1391-400.
15. McClintock, Robinson J, Rinchose DJ, Zullo TG. Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form. Am J Orthod 1986;89:499-506.
16. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Katic MJ. Craniofacial norms in North American Caucasians from birth to young adulthood. In: Farkas LG, editor. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1994:241-335.
17. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G. A three-dimensional quantitative analysis of lips in normal young adults. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 2002;37(1):48-54.
18. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995;1:67-81.
19. Hajnis K, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Lee ST, Venkatadri G. Racial and ethnic morphometric differences in the craniofacial complex. In: Farkas LG, editor. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1994:201-21.
20. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;103:327-37.
21. Latta GH. The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient. J Pros Dent 1988;59:681-3.
22. Broadbent TR, Mathews VL. Artistic relationship in surface anatomy of the face. Plast and Reconstr Surg 1957;20(1):1-17.
23. Latta GH, Weaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:250-4.
24. Gatcliff BP, Snow CC. From skull to visage. J Biocommun 1979;6(2):27-30.
25. Angel JL. Restoration of head and face for identification. Proceedings of Meetings of American Academy of Forensic Science; 1978; St. Louis, Missouri.
26. Caldwell MC. The relationship of the details of the human face to the skull and its application [M.A. thesis]. Arizona: Department Anthropology, Arizona State University, 1981.
27. Cole S. Races of man. London: British Museum Press, 1965.