Remote surgery: Present and future

Problems in General Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 73-78

  Marescaux, Jacques ^a   Rubino, Francesco ^b  

^a IRCAD   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMALE; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SURGERY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 0038048153     PISSN: 07398328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sgs.0000081176.89384.5e     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, et al. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998;133:957-61.
2. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1040-2.
3. Damiano RJ Jr, et al. Initial United States clinical trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:77-82.
4. Reichenspurner H, Boehm D, Reichart B. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using three-dimensional video and robotic assistance. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:235-40.
5. Satava RM. Virtual reality, telesurgery, and the new world order of medicine. J Image Guid Surg 1995;1:12-6.
6. Satava RM. Virtual reality and telepresence for military medicine. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;26:118-20.
7. Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, et al. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 1996;10:107-10.
8. Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, et al. Telementoring. A practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc 1997;11:852-5.
9. Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR. Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 1998;160:1413.
10. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Partin AW, et al. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience. Urology 1994;44:15-9.
11. Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G, et al. A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol 1998;16:367-70.
12. Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, et al. Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endouro1 2000;14:493-6.
13. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 2001;285:568-72.
14. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:379-80.
15. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 2002;235:487-92.
16. Link RE, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR. Telesurgery: remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:177-87.
17. Rosser J, Herman B, Ehrenwerth C. An overview of videostreaming on the Internet and its application to surgical education. Surg Endosc [serial online]. March 2001.
18. Schulam PG, et al. Telesurgical mentoring. Initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 1997;11:1001-5.
19. Sudarsan SP, Du LQ, Cobb PN, et al. Influence of frame rate and image delay on virtual driving performance. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997;33:203-8.
20. Fabrizio MD, et al. Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation. J Endourol 2000;14:133-8.
21. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389-402.