Library economic metrics: Examples of the comparison of electronic and print journal collections and collection services

Library Trends

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 376-400

  King, Donald W ^a   Boyce, Peter B ^b   Montgomery, Carol Hansen ^c   Tenopir, Carol ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038047631     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Baumol, W. J., & Marcus, M. (1973). Economics of academic libraries. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
2. Bickner, R. E. (1971). Concepts of economic costs. In King, D. W., Roderer, N. K., & Olsen, H. A. (Eds.), Key papers in the economics of information, 1983 (pp. 107-46). New York: Knowledge Industry Publications.
3. Buckland, M. K. (1983). Library services in theory and context. New York: Pergamon Press.
4. Charles River Associates (1978). Development of a model of the demand for scientific and technical information services. Cambridge, MA: Charles River Associates.
5. Clark, P. M. (1976). A study to refine and test new measures of library service and train library personnel in their use. Rutgers University: Bureau of Library and Information Science Research.
6. Cooper, M. D. (1979). The economics of library size: A preliminary inquiry. Library Trends 28 (Summer): 63-78.
7. Gummings, M. M. (1986). The economics of research libraries. Washington, DC: Council on Library Resources.
8. D'Elia, G., & Walsh S. (1983). User satisfaction with library service - a measure of public library performance? Library Quarterly, 53(2), 109-33.
9. deProspo, E. R. et al. (1973). Performance measures for public libraries. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
10. Goodman, D. (2002). A year without print at Princeton, and what we plan next. Learned Publishing, 13(1), 43-50.
11. Griffiths, J-M. (1977). The Computer Simulation of Information Retrieval Systems. Doctoral Dissertation, University College London.
12. Griffiths, J-M. (1998). Why the Web is not a library. In Hawkins, B. L., & Battin, P. (Eds.), The mirage of continuity: Reconfiguring academic information resources for the twenty-first century (pp. 229-246). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources and the Association of American Libraries.
13. Griffiths, J-M. (2002). Performance measurement in libraries. International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2nd ed. (printing in progress).
14. Griffiths, J-M., & King, D. W. (1986). A study of library staffing. Final report. Prepared for the California State University, Office of the Chancellor. King Research, Inc.
15. Griffiths, J-M., & King, D. W. (1989). Keys to success. Performance Indicators for Public Libraries. British Library, Office of Arts and Libraries. [Available from Unipub, 4611 F Assembly Drive, Lanham, MD, 20706].
16. Griffiths, J-M., & King, D. W. (1991). Massachusetts libraries: An alliance for the future: Final report. Prepared for the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners. Boston, MA: King Research, Inc.
17. Griffiths, J-M., & King, D. W. (1993). Special libraries: Increasing the information edge. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
18. Guthrie, K. M. (2000). Revitalizing older published literature: Preliminary lessons from the use of JSTOR. Paper presented at the PEAK Conference. (March). Retrieved April 4, 2001, from http://www.jstor.org/about/preliminarylessons.html.
19. Hamburg, M. et al. (1974). Library planning and decision-making systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Kantor, P. B. (1984). Objective performance measures for academic and research libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
21. Kidd, T. (2002). Electronic journal usage statistics in practice. Serials, 15(1), 11-17.
22. King, D. W., & Bryant, E. C. (1971). The evaluation of information services and products. Washington, DC: Information Resources Press.
23. King, D. W., & Lancaster, F. W. (1969). Costs, performance, and benefits of Information systems. In Proceeedings of the American Society for Information Science, 6, 501-505.
24. King D. W., & Montgomery, C. H. (2002). After migration to an electronic journal collection: Impact on faculty and doctoral students. D-lib Magazine, 8(12). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/12king/12king.html.
25. King, D. W., & Palmour, V. E. (1974). User behavior. In Fenichel, C. (Ed.), Changing patterns in information retrieval (Proceedings of the 19th Annual National Information Retrieval Colloquium). Philadelphia: American Society for Information Science.
26. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. In Williams, M. E. (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology: Vol. 34, Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
27. King, D. W., & Xu, H. (2003). Library consortia & electronic journal services. In Pearce, A., The consortium license: Is it a sustainable model? Oxford: Ingenta Institute.
28. King, D. W., Neel, P. N., & Wood, B. L. (1972). Comparative evaluation of retrieval effectiveness of descriptor and free-text search systems using CIRCOL (Central Information Reference and Control Online). Prepared for Rome Air Development Center, MD: Westat, Inc. AD-738299.
29. King, D. W. et al. (1976). Statistical indicators of scientific and technical information communication (1960-1980). Volume I: A summary report. National Science Foundation C-878. King Research Inc., Center for Quantitative Sciences. GPO 083-000-00295-3.
30. King, D. W. et al. (1981). Scientific journals in the United States: Their production, use, and economics. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson-Ross Publishing Co.
31. Lancaster, F. W. (1977). The measurement and evaluation of library services. Washington, DC: Information Resources Press.
32. Lancaster, F. W. (1993). If you want to evaluate your library . . . 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
33. Luther, J. (2000) White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
34. Machlup, F. (1979). Uses, value, and benefits of knowledge. In Knowledge: Creation, diffusion, and utilization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
35. McClure, C. R., & Lopata, C. L. (1996). Assessing the academic networked environment: Strategies and options. Washington, DC: Coalition for Networked Information.
36. McClure, C. R. et al. (1987). Planning & role setting for public libraries. Prepared for the Public Library Development Project. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
37. McDonald, D. D. et al. (1981). Cost and usage study of the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) System. Submitted to National Institute of Education (ED 208902). Rockville, MD: King Research.
38. Miller, R., & Schmidt, S. (2002). E-metrics: Measures for electronic resources. Serials, 15(1), 19-25.
39. Montgomery, C. H. & King, D. W. (2002). Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections: A first step towards a comprehensive analysis. D-lib Magazine, 8(10). Reprinted in New States Review of Information Networking 6 (2000). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html.
40. Morse, P. M. (1968). Library effectiveness: A systems approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Odlyzko, A. (2002). The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing, 15(1). 7-19.
42. Palmour, V. E. et al. (1980a). A planning process for public libraries. Prepared for the Public Library Association of the American Library Association.
43. Palmour, V. E. et al. (1980b). Public library services. In Washnis, G. J. (Ed.), Productivity improvement handbook for state and local government (pp. 1446-64). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Shim, W. et al (2001). Measures and statistics for research library networked services: Procedures and issues. ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
45. Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
46. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2001). Lessons for the future journals. Nature, 413 (October), 672-674.
47. Van House, N. A. et al. (1987). Output measures for public libraries. Prepared for the Public Library Development Project. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
48. Zweizig, D., & Rodger, E. J. (1982). Output measures for public libraries: A manual of standardized procedures. Prepared for the Public Library Association of the American Library Association.