Cochrane back review group

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1215-1218

  Bouter, Lex M ^a   Pennick, Victoria ^b   Bombardier, Claire ^b,c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Institute for Work Health   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKACHE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPACT DISK; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NECK PAIN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE DISEASE;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES; LOW BACK PAIN; NECK PAIN; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0038046386     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200306150-00002     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 2001;26:2504-13.
2. Bombardier C, Esmail R, Nachemson AL, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. Spine 1997;22:837-40.
3. The Cochrane Library; Issue 1, 2003, Oxford: Update Software.
4. Bombardier C, Bouter L, de Bie R, et al. Cochrane Back Group. In: The Cochrane Library; Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
5. Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group Web site. Available at: http:// www.cochrane.iwh.on.ca. Accessed March 20, 2003.
6. Clark M, Oxman AD, eds. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.15 [updated April 2002]. In: The Cochrane Library; Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
7. van Tulder M, Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, et al. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. Spine 1997;22:2323-30.
8. van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28:1290-9.
9. Cochrane Collaboration Consumer Network Web site. Available at: http:// www.cochraneconsumer.com. Accessed March 20, 2003.
10. Institute for Work and Health. Linkages Newsletter series. Available at: http://www.iwh.on.ca/Pages/Publications/linkages/linkages-index.htm. Accessed March 20, 2003.
11. Ferreira PH, Ferreira FCG, Maher CG, et al. Effect of applying different "levels of evidence" criteria on the conclusions of Cochrane reviews of interventions for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1126-9.
12. Smidt N, Assendelft WJJ, van der Windt DA WM, et al. Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Pain 2002;96:23-40.
13. Cochrane Collaboration Non-Randomized Studies Methods Group Web site. http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/index.htm. Accessed March 20, 2003.
14. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 2002;2:9 (available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/2/9. Accessed March 20, 2003).
15. Furlan AD, Clarke J, Esmail R, et al. A critical review of reviews on the treatment of chronic low back pain. Spine 2001;26:E155-E162.
16. Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, Knipschild PG, et al. The relation between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation. JAMA 1995;274:1942-8.