Legal considerations for cryopreservation of sperm and embryos

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 61-66

  Schuster, Timothy G ^a   Hickner Cruz, Kathryn ^b   Ohl, Dana A ^a   Goldman, Edward ^c   Smith, Gary D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Embryo; Law; Legal; Sperm

Indexed keywords

COURT; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO DISPOSITION; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; GAMETE; HUMAN; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPERM PRESERVATION;

EID: 0038045259     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00503-X     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Waldman E.A. Disputing over embryos of contracts and consents . Ariz State Law J. 32:2000;897-940.
2. Hecht v Superior Court. 1996;. 50 Cal. App. 4th 1289.
3. Hecht v Superior Court. 1993;. 16 Cal. App. 4th 836.
4. Woodward v Commissioner of Social Security. 2002;. 760 N.E. 2d 257 (Mass. 2002).
5. Litowitz v Litowitz. 2000;. 102 Wn. App. 934.
6. Litowitz v Litowitz. 2002;. 48 P. 3d 261.
7. Davis v Davis. 1992;. 842 S.W. 2d 588.
8. Kass v Kass. 1998;. 91 N.Y. 2d 554.
9. AZ v BZ. 2000;. 431 Mass. 150.
10. JB v MB. 2000;. 331 N.J. Super. 223.
11. JB v MB. 2001;. 170 N.J. 9.
12. Vukadinovich D.M. Assisted reproductive technology law. Obtaining informed consent for the commercial cryopreservation of embryos. J Leg Med. 21:2000;67-78.