Calcaneous ultrasonography es measurement of osteoporosis prevalence in the general population in relation to the diagnostic criterion utilized. Data of the study GIUMO;Prevalencia e osteoporosis en la población española por ultrasonografía de calcáneo en función del criterio diagnóstico utilizado. Datos del estudio GIUMO

Revista Clinica Espanola

Volumn 203, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 329-333

  Sosa Henriquez M ^a   Saavedra Santana, P ^a   Alegre Lopez J ^b   Gomez Alonso C ^b   Gonzalez Macias J ^b   Guanabens Gay N ^b   Hawkins Carranza, F ^b   Lozano Tonkin, C ^b   Martinez Izquierdo M T ^b   Mosquera Martinez J ^b   Munoz Torres M ^b   Perez Cano R ^b   Quesada Gomez J M ^b   Salas Heredia, E ^b   Minguez M ^b   Cannata Andia J B ^b   Rodriguez Rebollar A ^b   Martin Ordonez F ^b   Mateos Fernandez J J ^b   Diez Perez A ^b   Nogues Solan X ^b   Alvarez Lario B ^b   Alonso Valdivieso, J L ^b   Olmos Martinez J ^b   Valero Diaz de la Madrid C ^b   García de Córdoba, Beatriz ^b   Mezquita Raya, P ^b   Lopez Rodriguez F ^b   Hernandez Hernandez D ^b   Martin Alamo N ^b   Sarmiento Santana, J ^b   Jodar Gimeno E ^b   Martinez G ^b   Jareno Chaumel J ^b   Castro Lago, A ^b   Gomez de Tejada Romero M J ^b   Perez Temprano A ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b Univ de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ^*

Author keywords

Heel; Osteopenia; Osteoporosis; Prevalence; Ultrasound; WHO criteria

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPENIA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; RADIODENSITOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SPAIN; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; METABOLIC BONE DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASES, METABOLIC; CALCANEUS; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPAIN;

EID: 0038044830     PISSN: 00142565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2565(03)71281-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Walker-Bone K, Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2001;27:1-18.
2. Miller PD, Zapalowski C, Julak CAM, Bilezikian JP. Bone densitometry: the best way to detect osteoporosis and to monitor therapy. J Clin Endocrinol 1999;84:1867-71.
3. Melton LJ, Atkinson E, O'Fallon WM, Whaner HW, Riggs BL. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1227-33.
4. Guglielmi G, Gluer CC, Majumdar S, Blunt BA, Genant HK. Current methods and advances in bone densitometry. Eur Radiol 1995;5:129-39.
5. Blake GM, Fogelman I. Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Semin Nucl Med 2001;31:69-81.
6. Informe de la Report of a WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: WHO Technical Report Series 843. World Health Organization, 1994.
7. Glüer CC. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1280-8.
8. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:406-16.
9. Ayers M, Prince M, Ahmadi S, Baran DT. Reconciling quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus with X-ray-based measurements of the central skeleton. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:1850-5.
10. Blake DM, Knapp K, Fogelman I. Should equivalent Tscores be based on absolute fracture risk? Osteoporos Int 2001;12(Suppl 2):S8-9.
11. Martín N, Limiñana JM, Castro R, Travesí I, Sablón N, Cabrera E, Sosa M. Valores de masa ósea por ultrasonidos de calcáneo. Rev Esp Enf Metab Oseas 1998;7(Suppl A ):41.
12. Sosa M, Saavedra P, Muñoz-Torres M, Alegre J, Gómez C, González-Macías J, et al and the GIUMO Study Group. Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data and precision in spanish population. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:487-92.
13. Consensus Development Conference. Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993;94:646-50.
14. Sosa Henríquez M. Consecuencias de la osteoporosis. En: Rapado Errazti A, Díaz Curiel M, Galindo P, editores. Osteoporosis: una guía para profesionales de la salud. Madrid: Fundación Hispana de Osteoporosis y Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas (FHOEMO), 1997;5:21-4.
15. Schnitzler CM. Bone quality: a determinant for certain risk factors for bone fragility. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53(Suppl 1):S151-S156.
16. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age-and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:456-64.
17. Cetin A, Erturk H, Celiker R, Sivri A, Hascelik Z. The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Rheumatol Int 2001;20:55-9.
18. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 2000;11(4):321-30.
19. López Rodríguez F. Rendimiento de una técnica cuantitativa de ultrasonidos en una unidad de metabolismo óseo. Granada: Tesis doctoral, 2001.
20. Faulkner KG, von Stetten E, Miller P. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 1999;2:343-50.
21. Wahner HW. Use oif densitometry in management of osteoporosis. En: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editores. Osteoporosis. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 1996; p. 1055-74.
22. García JJ, Carrasco JL, Honorato J, Pérez Cano R, Díaz Curiel M. Álvarez Sanz C, et al. Prevalencia de la osteoporosis determinada por densitometría en la población femenina española. Med Clin (Barc) 2001; 116:86-8.
23. Selby PL, Davies M, Adams JE. Do men and women fracture bones at similar bone densities? Osteoporos Int 2000;11:153-7.
24. Lin JD, Chen JF, Chang HY, Ho C. Evaluation of bone mineral density by quantitative ultrasound of bone in 16,862 subjects during routine health examination. Br J Radiol 2001;74:602-6.
25. Ingle BM, Sherwood KE, Eastell R. Comparison of two methods for measuring ultrasound properties of the heel in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:500-5.