On the effect of communication delays in failure diagnosis of decentralized discrete event systems

Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 263-289

  Debouk, Rami ^a,b   Lafortune, Stéphane ^a   Teneketzis, Demosthenis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication delays; Decentralized information; Diagnostic protocols; Discrete event systems; Failure diagnosis

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

COMMUNICATION DELAYS;

DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0038036089     PISSN: 09246703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024007808984     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aghasaryan, A., Fabre, E., Benveniste, A., Boubour, R., and Jard, C. 1998. Fault detection and diagnosis in distributed systems: An approach by partially stochastic petri nets. Journal of Discrete Event Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications, August, 203-231.
2. Baroni, P., Lamperti, G., Pogliano, P., and Zanella, M. 1999. Diagnosis of large active systems. Artificial Intelligence 110: 135-183.
3. Bertsekas, D., and Gallager, R. 1992. Data Networks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Deb, S., Mathur, A., Willett, P., and Pattipati, K. R. 1998. De-centralized real-time monitoring and diagnosis. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, October, 2998-3003.
5. Debouk, R. 2000. Failure Diagnosis of Decentralized Discrete Event Systems. PhD thesis, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, The University of Michigan. Available at http://www.eecs.umich.edu/umdes.
6. Debouk, R., Lafortune, S., and Teneketzis, D. 2000. Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete-event systems. Journal of Discrete Event Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications 10: 33-86.
7. Fabre, E., Benveniste, A., Jard, C., Ricker, S. L., and Mark Smith. 2000. Distributed state reconstruction for discrete event systems. In Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, December 2252-2257, Sydney, Australia.
8. Holloway, L., and Chand, S. 1994. Time templates for discrete event fault monitoring in manufacturing systems. In Proc. 1994 American Control Conference, 701-706.
9. Mohindra, S., and Clark, P. A. 1993. A distributed fault diagnosis method based on digraph models: Steady-state analysis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 17(2): 193-209.
10. Pencolé, Y. 2000. Decentralized diagnoser approach: Application to telecommunication networks. In Proc. of DX'2000, Eleventh International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, June, 185-192.
11. Pouliezos, A. D., and Stavrakakis, G. S. 1994. Real time fault monitoring of industrial processes. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Ricker, S. L., and Fabre, E. 2000. On the construction of modular observers and diagnosers for discrete-event systems. In Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, December, Sydney, Australia.
13. Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., and Teneketzis, D. 1995. Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 40(9): 1555-1575.
14. Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K., and Teneketzis, D. 1996. Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Tech. 4(2): 105-124.
15. Sengupta, R., 1998. Diagnosis and communication in distributed systems. In Proc. of WODES 1998, International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems, 144-151, August. London, England: IEE.
16. Stark, W. E., Wang, H., Worthen, A., Lafortune, S., and Teneketzis, D. 2002. Low energy wireless communication network design. IEEE Wireless Communication Magazine, August 60-72.
17. Schmid, U., Guest Editor. 1997. Special issue on global time in large scale distributed real time systems. Real Time Systems 12(I, II, and III): 1-351.
18. Willsky, A. 1996. A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica 12: 601-611.