Electoral support for tax cuts: A case study of the 1980 American presidential election

American Politics Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 288-307

  Lacy, Dean ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038034341     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9802600302     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (1982). Change and continuity in the 1980 elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
2. Achen, C. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior, 14, 195-211.
3. Beck, P. A., & Dye, T. R. (1982). Sources of public opinion on taxes: The Florida case. The Journal of Politics, 44, 172-182.
4. Beck, P. A., Rainey, H. G., & Traut, C. (1990). Disadvantage, disaffection, and race as divergent bases for citizen fiscal policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 52, 71-93.
5. Carmines, E., & Stimson, J. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 78-91.
6. Citrin, J. (1979). Do people want something for nothing? Public opinion on taxes and spending. National Tax Journal, 32, 113-129.
7. Courant, P. N., Grämlich, E. M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1980). Why voters support tax limitation amendments: The Michigan case. National Tax Journal, 33, 1-20.
8. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Jarvis, H. (1979). I'm mad as hell. New York: Times Books.
11. Key, V. O., Jr. (1966). The responsible electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Kiewiet, D. R. (1983). Macroeconomics and micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Kiewiet, D. R., & Kinder, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 149-161.
14. King, G. (1989). Unifying political methodology: The likelihood theory of statistical inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kinsley, M. (1995). Big babies. New York: Morrow.
16. Ladd, H. F., & Wilson, J. B. (1982). Why voters support tax limitation amendments: Evidence from Massachusetts' Proposition 2 1/2. National Tax Journal, 35, 121-148.
17. Lowery, D., & Sigelman, L. (1981). Understanding the tax revolt: Eight explanations. American Political Science Review, 75, 963-974.
18. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 86, 597-611.
19. McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103-120.
20. McManus, S. A. (1995). Taxing and spending politics: A generational perspective. The Journal of Politics, 57, 607-629.
21. Page, B., & Brody, R. (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The Vietnam issue. American Political Science Review, 66, 979-988.
22. Phillips, K. (1993). Boiling point: Democrats, Republicans, and the decline of middle-class prosperity. New York: Random House.
23. Rabushka, A., & Ryan, P. (1982). The tax revolt. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
24. Sears, D. O., & Citrin, J. (1985). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Wattenberg, M. P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Welch, S. (1985). The "more for less" paradox: Public attitudes on taxing and spending. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 310-316.