Computer-assisted measurements of plant growth with Linear Variable Differential Transformer (LVDT) sensors

Archives des Sciences et Compte Rendu Seances de la Societe

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 233-244

  Degli Agosti, Robert ^a   Jouve, Laurent ^b   Greppin, Hubert ^b  

^a Pavillon des Isotopes   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Floral stem; Growth; LVDT

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038032131     PISSN: 02529289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASSAAD-IBRAHIM, C., A. LECHARNY, & B. MILLET. 1981. Circadian endogenous growth rhythm in tomato. Plant Physiol. 67 (Suppl.): 113.
2. BAILLAUD, L. 1962. Mouvements autonomes des tiges, vrilles et autres organes à l'exception des organes volubiles et des feuilles. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Ruhland, W. (ed.). vol. XVII, Part 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 562-634.
3. BOSE, J.C. 1928. Plant response as a mean of physiological investigation. Longmans, Green & Co., London.
4. DECKER, W. & P. KOSTKA. 1989. Inductive and eddy current sensors. In: Sensors - A comprehensive survey. GÖPEL, W. , J. HESSE & J.N. ZEMEL (eds.) Volume 5: Magnetic sensors. BOLL, R. & K.J. OVERSHOTT (eds.). VCH, Veinheim. pp. 255-313.
5. DEPEGE, N., C. THONAT, C. COUTAND, J.-L. JULIEN & N. BOYER. 1997. Morphological responses and molecular modifications in tomato plants after mechanical stimulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 38: 1127-1134.
6. EDMUNDS, L.N. 1988. Cellular and molecular bases of biological clocks. Spinger- Verlag, New York.
7. GREPPIN, H. & R. DEGLI AGOSTI. 1997. Physiomatics and macrofunctions as a tool for development analysis. In: Travelling shot on plant development. GREPPIN, H., C. PENEL & P. SIMON (eds.). University of Geneva, Imprimerie Nationale , Genève, pp. 335-344.
8. HSIAO, T.C., E. ACEVEDO & D.W. HENDERSON. 1970. Maize leaf elongation: continuous measurements and the dependence on plant water status. Science. 168: 590-591.
9. JAFFE, M.L., R. BIRO & K. BRIDLE. 1980. Thigmomorphogenesis: calibration of the parameters of the sensory function in beans. Physiol. Plant. 49: 410-416.
10. JAFFE, M.J., A.H. WAKEFIELD, F. TELEWSKI, E. GULLEY & R. BIRO. 1985. Computer-assisted image analysis of plant growth, thigmomorphogenesis and gravitropsim. Plant Physiol. 77: 722-730.
11. JOUVE, L., H. GREPPIN & R. DEGLI AGOSTI. 1998. Arabidopsis thaliana floral stem elongation: Evidence for an endogenous circadian rhythm. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36 (5), In press.
12. KERCKHOFFS, L.H.J., M.M.T. SENGERS & R.E. KENDRICK. 1997. Growth analysis of wild-type and photomorphogenetic-mutant tomato plants. Physiol. Plant. 99: 309-315.
13. KRISTIE, D.M. & P.A. JOLLIFFE. 1986. High-resolution studies for growth oscillations during stem elongation. Can. J. Bot. 64: 2399-2405.
14. LAIBACH, F. 1932. Interferometrische Untersuchungen an Pflanzen. II. Die Verwendbarkeit des Interferometers in der Pflanzenphysiologie. Jb. wiss. Bot. 76: 218-282.
15. LECHARNY, A. & R. JACQUES. 1980. Light inhibition of internode elongation in green plants. Planta. 149: 384-388.
16. LECHARNY, A. & E. WAGNER. 1984. Stem extension rale in light-grown plants. Evidence for an endogenous circadian rhythm in Chenopodium rubrum L. Physiol. Plant. 60: 437-443.
17. MACDONALD, I.R., D.C. GORDON & J.W. HART. 1987. Cyclamen coiling - the migration of a growth response. Plant Cell Environ. 10: 613-617.
18. MEISSNER, K.W. 1929. Ein Interferometer zur Untersuchungen von Wachstumsvorgängen. Phys. Z. 30: 965-971.
19. MILLAR, A.J., I.A. CARRÉ. C.A. STRAYER, N.-H. CHUA & S.A. KAY. 1995. Circadian clocks in Arabidopsis identified by luciferase imaging. Science. 267: 1161-1163.
20. MILLAR, A.J. & S.A. KAY. 1997. The genetics of phottransduction and circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. BioEssays. 19: 209-214.
21. OGIER, G., B. BONNET & Z. TAMINI. 1987. Etude du rythme circadien de croissance de la tige de soja. Relation entre feuille, tige et racine. Archs. Sci. (Genève). 40: 307-318.
22. PENNY, D., P. DENNY & D.C. MARSHALL. 1974. High resolution measurement of plant growth. Can. J. Bot. 52: 959-969.
23. PFEFFER, W. 1900. Die Anwendung des Projektionsapparates zur Demonstration von Lebensvorgängen. Jb. wiss. Bot. 35: 711-745.
24. PRAT, R. & G. PARÉSYS. 1995. High resolution study of plant cell growth kinetics. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 33:709-716.
25. RUGE, U. 1961. Methoden der Wachstumsmessung. In: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology ( RUHLAND, W., ed.) Vol. XIV. Growth and growth substances. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, pp. 47-70.
26. RUIZ-FERNANDEZ, S. & E. WAGNER. 1994. A new method of measurement and analysis of the stem extension rate to demonstrate complete synchronisation of Chenopodium rubrum plants by environmental conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 144: 362-369.
27. SACHS, J. 1870. Lehrbuch der Botanik, 2 Aufl. Engelman, Leipzig.
28. SACHS, J. 1887. Vorlesungen über Pflanzen-Physiologie. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
29. WIESNER, J. 1876. Uber eine neue Construction des selbstregistrireden Auxanometers. Flora (Jena). 59: 467-475.