Assessing state vocational rehabilitation performance in serving individuals with disability

Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 24-39

  Lewis, Darrell R ^a   Johnson, David R ^a   Scholl, Steven R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION;

EID: 0038032005     PISSN: 13668250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1366825031000086876     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Alemi, F., Stephens, R. C., Llorens, S., & Orris, B. (1995). A review of factors affecting treatment outcomes: expected treatment outcome scale. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 21(4), 83-509.
2. Bellante, D. (1972). A multivariate analysis of a vocational rehabilitation program. Journal of Human Resources, 7(2), 226-241.
3. Bier, V. M., & Connell, B. L. (1994). Ambiguity seeking in multi-attribute decisions: effects of optimism and message framing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(3), 169-182.
4. Brown, N. J. (1991). A multiattribute evaluation model for environmental compliance of existing metal hydroxide precipitation systems in the electroplating industry. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
5. Camasso, M. J., & Dick, J. (1993). Using multiattribute utility theory as a priority-setting tool in human services planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16(4), 295-304.
6. Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: a field guide. London: Sage.
7. Christenson, S. L. (1993). Computer-aided decision analysis: theory and application. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
8. Conley, R. (1969). A benefit-cost analysis of the vocational rehabilitation program. Journal of Human Resources, 4(2), 226-252.
9. Dicker, P. F., & Dicker, M. P. (1991). Involved in systems evaluation? Use a multiattribute analysis approach to get the answers. Industrial Engineering, 23, 43-46.
10. Doyle, J. R. (1995). Multiattribute choice for the lazy decision maker: let the alternatives decide. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 87-100.
11. Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Walleins, J., & Zionts, S. (1992). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years. Management Science, 38(5), 645-654.
12. Edwards, W. (1980). Multiattribute utility for evaluation: structures, uses, and problems. In M. Klein & K. Teilmann (Eds.), Handbook of criminal justice evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Edwards, W., Guttentag, M., & Snapper, K. (1975). Effective evaluation: a decision theoretic approach. In C. A. Bennett & A. Lumsdaine (Eds.), Evaluation and environment: some critical issues in assessing social programs. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14. Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Hanson, M. E., Kidwell, S., & Ray, D. (1991). Electric utility least-cost planning: making it work within a multiattribute decision-making framework. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57, 34-43.
16. Hidalgo-Hardeman, O. M. (1993). Evaluating social service delivery configurations. Evaluation Review, 17(6), 603-620.
17. Huber, G. P. (1974). Multiattribute utility models: a review of field and fieldlike studies. Management Science, 20, 1393-1402.
18. Kahn, B. E., & Baron, J. (1995). An exploratory study of choice rules favored for high-stakes decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(4), 305-328.
19. Kahn, B. E., & Meyer, R. J. (1991). Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 508-522.
20. Kaplan, R. M., Atkins, C. J., & Wilson, D. K. (1988). The cost-utility of diet and exercise interventions in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Promotion, 2, 331-340.
21. Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
22. Kemp, S., & Willetts, K. (1995). Rating the value of government-funded services: comparison of methods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 1-21.
23. Levin, H. M. (1983). Cost-effectiveness: a primer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Levine, J. (1996). A multiattribute analysis of goals for intelligent transportation system planning. Transportation Research: Emerging Technologies, 4(2).
25. Lewis, D. R. (1989). Use of cost-utility decision models in business education. Journal of Education in Business, 64(March), 275-278.
26. Lewis, D. R., & Johnson, D. R. (2000). Evaluation of participatory decision-making strategies for special education and rehabilitation programs. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
27. Lewis, D. R., Johnson, D. R., Erickson, R. N., & Bruininks, R. H. (1994). Multiattribute evaluation of program alternatives in special education. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5(1), 77-112.
28. Lewis, D. R., Johnson, D. R., & Mangen, T. (1998). Evaluating the multiattribute nature of supported employment. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 11(2), 95-115.
29. Lewis, D. R., & Kallsen, L. (1995). Multiattribute evaluations: an aid in reallocation decisions in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 437-465.
30. McDaniels, T. L. (1996). A multiattribute index for evaluating environmental impacts of electric utilities. Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 57-66.
31. Nowak, L. (1983). A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the federal/state vocational rehabilitation program using a comparison group. American Economist, 27(1), 23-29.
32. Pandey, P. C., & Kengpol, A. (1995). Selection of an automated inspection system using multiattribute decision analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 39(3), 289-298.
33. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems. In C. Steinfield & J. Fulk (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to information technologies organizations (pp. 174-195). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Salazar, M. K., & de Moor, C. (1995). An evaluation of mammography beliefs using a decision model. Health Education Quarterly, 22(1), 110-126.
35. Samuelson, C. (1993). A multiattribute evaluation approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 55(2), 298-324.
36. Scholl, S. (1995). Consumer satisfaction, follow-up and goal attainment of the vocational rehabilitation program. Unpublished final report. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Economic Security, Vocational Rehabilitation Services Branch.
37. Stoddard, S., & Staff (1982). Vocational rehabilitation program standards evaluating systems: executive summary. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Planning Associates.
38. Tzeng, G., Teng, J., & Hu, C. (1991). Urban environmental evaluation and improvement: application of multiattribute utility and compromise programming. Behaviormetrika, 29, 83-98.
39. Worrall, J. (1978). A benefit-cost analysis of the vocational rehabilitation program. Journal of Human Resources, 13(2), 285-298.